A Path to Clinical Quality Integration Through a Clinically Integrated Network: The Experience of an Academic Health System and Its Community Affiliates

被引:2
作者
Friedman, Lawrence S. [1 ,2 ]
Sitapati, Amy M. [3 ,4 ]
Holland, Jennifer [5 ]
Gaylis, Franklin [6 ]
Kraus, David [7 ]
Rufo, Michael [8 ]
Pan, Jeffrey [7 ]
Campbell, Duncan [9 ]
Longhurst, Christopher A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Clin Med & Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Clin Affairs, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Med, San Diego, CA USA
[4] UCSD Hlth, Populat Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Enterprise Reporting, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Genesis Healthcare Partners, San Diego, CA USA
[7] UCSD Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[8] UCSD Hlth, Phys Network, San Diego, CA USA
[9] UCSD Hlth, Phys Hlth Network, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Academic medical centers (AMCs) and community physicians seeking to establish a clinically integrated network (CIN) may benefit from a road map to navigate the opportunities and challenges of such an organizational structure. Creating and participating in a CIN requires careful consideration, investment of time, financial resources, alignment of a new quality infrastructure, shared governance, and vision. Potential Benefits, Challenges, and Regulatory Considerations: Potential AMC benefits include geographic clinical expansion, the ability to provide care for a broader population of patients, a mechanism to collaborate with regional physician graduates, and an expansion of available teaching sites for trainees. Potential benefits to community practices include propagation of high-value care, enhanced access to evidence-based protocols and priority measures, preparation for value-based reimbursement structures, and connection to an institution that produces future health care practitioners. Challenges to CIN creation include goal alignment, trust between AMC and community partners, acceptance of common quality measures and benchmarks, access to shared data, and local adoption of quality improvement activities. Quality and Information Technology Considerations: At inception the mission was to create an innovative academic-community alliance delivering high-quality, high-value, personalized care. Defining the clinical quality goals, measurement, governance, and improvement strategy, as well as information technology structure and decision making, are described. Future Directions: The network continues to grow and now includes more than 350 physicians, in 16 different specialties across 50 different independent medical practices throughout Southern California. We believe this builds a firm foundation for value-based health care.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years [J].
Blumenthal, David ;
Abrams, Melinda ;
Nuzum, Rachel .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (25) :2451-2458
[2]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics, 2020, HLTH EXP
[3]   Health information exchange policies of 11 diverse health systems and the associated impact on volume of exchange [J].
Downing, N. Lance ;
Adler-Milstein, Julia ;
Palma, Jonathan P. ;
Lane, Steven ;
Eisenberg, Matthew ;
Sharp, Christopher ;
Longhurst, Christopher A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (01) :113-122
[4]  
Federal Trade Commission, 2013, COMMUNICATION 0213
[5]  
Findlay S, 2016, HLTH POLICY BRIEF ME
[6]   Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer in a Community Practice: How to Measure, Manage, and Improve? [J].
Gaylis, Franklin ;
Cohen, Edward ;
Calabrese, Renee ;
Prime, Hilary ;
Dato, Paul ;
Kane, Christopher J. .
UROLOGY, 2016, 93 :60-66
[7]  
Giovannelli J, 2016, HLTH AFFAIRS HLTH PO
[8]  
Hwang W, 2015, J HOSP ADM, V4, P36
[9]  
Montie James E, 2014, Urol Pract, V1, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.urpr.2014.04.003
[10]  
Porter ME, 2013, HARVARD BUS REV, V91, P50