An empirical study of the SO2 allowance market:: Effects of PUC regulations

被引:31
作者
Arimura, TH [1 ]
机构
[1] Sophia Univ, Dept Econ, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1028554, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeem.2001.1202
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates electric utility behavior under the SO2 allowance market in Phase I. The probit model shows that cost recovery rules promoted high sulfur coal usage for utilities located in states with coal mines. A simulation shows that protecting these local coal industry increased high sulfur coal usage by 50%. Another finding is that the uncertainty of PUC regulations pushed utilities from the allowance market toward fuel switching/blending. Since the second effect was stronger than the first, the overall PUC regulations contributed to an unexpectedly low allowance price at the beginning of Phase I. (C) 2002 Eisevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 289
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Amemiya Takeshi., 1985, Advanced Econometrics
[2]  
AVERCH H, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1052
[3]  
BAILEY EM, 1996, 96002 MIT CTR EN ENV
[4]   UTILITY INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR AND THE EMISSION TRADING MARKET [J].
BOHI, DR ;
BURTRAW, D .
RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1992, 14 (1-2) :129-153
[5]   The SO2 emissions trading program: Cost savings without allowance trades [J].
Burtraw, D .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 1996, 14 (02) :79-94
[6]   Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: What are the gains from trade? [J].
Carlson, C ;
Burtraw, D ;
Cropper, M ;
Palmer, KL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (06) :1292-1326
[7]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[8]  
COGGINS JS, 1993, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V25, P275
[9]  
Cronshaw MB, 1996, J REGUL ECON, V9, P179
[10]  
Dales JH., 1968, Pollution, property & prices