Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of prior probability on response preparation

被引:36
作者
Scheibe, Christina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schubert, Ruth [4 ]
Sommer, Werner [3 ]
Heekeren, Hauke R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin NeuroImaging Ctr, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev & Educ, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite, Neurophys Grp, Neurol Clin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
CNV; LRP; Precue paradigm; Preparatory processes; Prior probability; Source localization; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE-VARIATION; CHOICE-REACTION-TIME; MOVEMENT PREPARATION; BRAIN POTENTIALS; DECISION-MAKING; STIMULUS PROBABILITY; ADVANCE INFORMATION; CINGULATE CORTEX; MOTOR; CNV;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00825.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated whether prior probability (PP) information modulates preparatory processes at a central premotor level or at a peripheral motor level. We provided parametrically graded probability information during the foreperiod of a precuing paradigm. The Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and the Lateralized Readiness Potential (LRP) were used as indicators for premotor and motor preparation during the foreperiod, respectively. The CNV amplitude was parametrically modulated by PP. In contrast, the LRP amplitude during the foreperiod differed from baseline only when the precue was reliable. The interval between precue and LRP onset was shortened when probability information was delivered in contrast to noninformative advance information. Furthermore, a source analysis for the foreperiod revealed a dipole in the anterior cingulate cortex. Together, our results suggest that PP modulates preparatory processes at a central premotor level.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 770
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Neural aspects of anticipatory behavior [J].
Brunia, CHM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :213-242
[2]   NEURAL COMPUTATION OF LOG LIKELIHOOD IN CONTROL OF SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
CARPENTER, RHS ;
WILLIAMS, MLL .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6544) :59-62
[3]   Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency: Evidence for independence of detection and decision [J].
Carpenter, RHS .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (17) :1576-1580
[4]  
COHEN J, 1966, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V2, P296
[5]   MODERN MIND-BRAIN READING - PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COGNITION [J].
COLES, MGH .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 26 (03) :251-269
[6]   USE OF PARTIAL STIMULUS INFORMATION IN RESPONSE PROCESSING [J].
DEJONG, R ;
WIERDA, M ;
MULDER, G ;
MULDER, LJM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1988, 14 (04) :682-692
[7]   Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study [J].
Fan, Jin ;
Kolster, Rachel ;
Ghajar, Jamshid ;
Suh, Minah ;
Knight, Robert T. ;
Sarkar, Ranjeeta ;
McCandliss, Bruce D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (09) :2272-2282
[8]   Executive frontal functions [J].
Fuster, JM .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 133 (01) :66-70
[9]   LATE CNV WAVE - PREPARATION VERSUS EXPECTANCY [J].
GAILLARD, AWK .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 14 (06) :563-568
[10]   PROBABILITY EFFECTS ON STIMULUS EVALUATION AND RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
GEHRING, WJ ;
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (01) :198-216