Hierarchy of research design used to categorize the "strength of evidence" in answering clinical dental questions

被引:27
作者
Jacob, RF
Carr, AB
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Dent, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/pr.2000.v83.apr832137
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to highlight important features of research design that clinicians can use to determine which articles are useful when attempting to answer clinical questions and determine the best therapy for a particular patient. This article offers a systematic means of categorizing the quality of research reports for clinicians and clinical investigators. A recurring clinical theme of hygiene education is used to exemplify how phrasing the clinical question determines the type of study design that could be used. The article describes the continuum of research reports, and categorizes them by their inherent strengths and weaknesses. The report describes why the research designs in the supreme position of the research hierarchy, are the most valuable to clinicians seeking evidence that defines the best therapy for their patients.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 152
页数:16
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   UNDERSTANDING DENTISTS RESTORATIVE TREATMENT DECISIONS [J].
BADER, JD ;
SHUGARS, DA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 1992, 52 (02) :102-110
[2]  
Carr AB, 2000, J PROSTHET DENT, V83, P13
[3]  
Feinstein A., 1985, Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research
[4]  
FLETCHER RH, 1996, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY
[5]  
Sackett DL., 1991, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY BA
[6]  
TUGWELL P, 1984, CLASSIFICATION DESIG