EDR signatures observed by MMS in the 16 October event presented in a 2-D parametric space

被引:2
作者
Alm, L. [1 ]
Argall, M. R. [1 ]
Torbert, R. B. [1 ,2 ]
Farrugia, C. J. [1 ]
Burch, J. L. [2 ]
Ergun, R. E. [3 ]
Russell, C. T. [4 ]
Strangeway, R. J. [4 ]
Khotyaintsev, Y. V. [5 ]
Lindqvist, P. -A. [6 ]
Marklund, G. T. [6 ]
Giles, B. L. [7 ]
Shuster, J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Space Sci Ctr, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Southwest Res Inst, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Lab Atmospher & Space Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, IGPP EPSS, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] IRF Swedish Inst Space Phys, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Coll Comp Math & Nat Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
magnetic reconnection; electron diffusion region; MMS; parametric space; multispacecraft; asymmetric reconnection; ELECTRON-DIFFUSION REGION; MAGNETIC RECONNECTION; FIELD; ACCELERATION; INSTRUMENT; MOTION;
D O I
10.1002/2016JA023788
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present a method for mapping the position of satellites relative to the X line using the measured B-L and B-N components of the magnetic field and apply it to the Magnetospheric multiscale (MMS) encounter with the electron diffusion region (EDR) which occurred on 13:07 UT on 16 October 2015. Mapping the data to our parametric space succeeds in capturing many of the signatures associated with magnetic reconnection and the electron diffusion region. This offers a method for determining where in the reconnection region the satellites were located. In addition, parametric mapping can also be used to present data from numerical simulations. This facilitates comparing data from simulations with data from in situ observations as one can avoid the complicated process using boundary motion analysis to determine the geometry of the reconnection region. In parametric space we can identify the EDR based on the collocation of several reconnection signatures, such as electron nongyrotropy, electron demagnetization, parallel electric fields, and energy dissipation. The EDR extends 2-3km in the normal direction and in excess of 20km in the tangential direction. It is clear that the EDR occurs on the magnetospheric side of the topological X line, which is expected in asymmetric reconnection. Furthermore, we can observe a north-south asymmetry, where the EDR occurs north of the peak in out-of-plane current, which may be due to the small but finite guide field.
引用
收藏
页码:3262 / 3276
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Electron nongyrotropy in the context of collisionless magnetic reconnection [J].
Aunai, Nicolas ;
Hesse, Michael ;
Kuznetsova, Maria .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2013, 20 (09)
[2]   Properties of asymmetric magnetic reconnection [J].
Birn, J. ;
Borovsky, J. E. ;
Hesse, M. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2008, 15 (03)
[3]   Preface [J].
Burch, J. L. ;
Torbert, R. B. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2016, 199 (1-4) :1-3
[4]   Scaling of asymmetric magnetic reconnection: General theory and collisional simulations [J].
Cassak, P. A. ;
Shay, M. A. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2007, 14 (10)
[5]   Evidence of an extended electron current sheet and its neighboring magnetic island during magnetotail reconnection [J].
Chen, L. -J. ;
Bessho, N. ;
Lefebvre, B. ;
Vaith, H. ;
Fazakerley, A. ;
Bhattacharjee, A. ;
Puhl-Quinn, P. A. ;
Runov, A. ;
Khotyaintsev, Y. ;
Vaivads, A. ;
Georgescu, E. ;
Torbert, R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2008, 113 (A12)
[6]   Motion of the MMS spacecraft relative to the magnetic reconnection structure observed on 16 October 2015 at 1307UT [J].
Denton, R. E. ;
Sonnerup, B. U. O. ;
Hasegawa, H. ;
Phan, T. D. ;
Russell, C. T. ;
Strangeway, R. J. ;
Giles, B. L. ;
Gershman, D. ;
Torbert, R. B. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (11) :5589-5596
[7]   Asymmetry of the Ion Diffusion Region Hall Electric and Magnetic Fields during Guide Field Reconnection: Observations and Comparison with Simulations [J].
Eastwood, J. P. ;
Shay, M. A. ;
Phan, T. D. ;
Oieroset, M. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 104 (20)
[8]  
Egedal J, 2012, NAT PHYS, V8, P321, DOI [10.1038/nphys2249, 10.1038/NPHYS2249]
[9]   The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission [J].
Ergun, R. E. ;
Tucker, S. ;
Westfall, J. ;
Goodrich, K. A. ;
Malaspina, D. M. ;
Summers, D. ;
Wallace, J. ;
Karlsson, M. ;
Mack, J. ;
Brennan, N. ;
Pyke, B. ;
Withnell, P. ;
Torbert, R. ;
Macri, J. ;
Rau, D. ;
Dors, I. ;
Needell, J. ;
Lindqvist, P. -A. ;
Olsson, G. ;
Cully, C. M. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2016, 199 (1-4) :167-188
[10]   Four-spacecraft determination of magnetopause orientation, motion and thickness:: comparison with results from single-spacecraft methods [J].
Haaland, SE ;
Sonnerup, BUÖ ;
Dunlop, MW ;
Balogh, A ;
Georgescu, E ;
Hasegawa, H ;
Klecker, B ;
Paschmann, G ;
Puhl-Quinn, P ;
Rème, H ;
Vaith, H ;
Vaivads, A .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2004, 22 (04) :1347-1365