Identifying Predictors of Psychological Distress During COVID-19: A Machine Learning Approach

被引:103
作者
Prout, Tracy A. [1 ]
Zilcha-Mano, Sigal [2 ]
Aafjes-van Doorn, Katie [3 ]
Bekes, Vera [3 ]
Christman-Cohen, Isabelle [1 ]
Whistler, Kathryn [1 ]
Kui, Thomas [1 ]
Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia [4 ]
机构
[1] Yeshiva Univ, Sch Clin Child Psychol Program, Ferkauf Grad Sch Psychol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Psychol, Haifa, Israel
[3] Yeshiva Univ, Ferkauf Grad Sch Psychol, Clin Psychol Program, Bronx, NY USA
[4] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg Med & Mol Pathol & Crit Care Med, Pisa, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; emotion regulation; somatization; machine learning; anxiety; depression; post-traumatic stress; defense mechanisms; DEFENSE-MECHANISMS; DEPRESSION; SEVERITY; VALIDITY; DISORDER; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586202
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Scientific understanding about the psychological impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic is in its nascent stage. Prior research suggests that demographic factors, such as gender and age, are associated with greater distress during a global health crisis. Less is known about how emotion regulation impacts levels of distress during a pandemic. The present study aimed to identify predictors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (N = 2,787) provided demographics, history of adverse childhood experiences, current coping strategies (use of implicit and explicit emotion regulation), and current psychological distress. The overall prevalence of clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress was higher than the prevalence outside a pandemic and was higher than rates reported among healthcare workers and survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Younger participants (<45 years), women, and non-binary individuals reported higher prevalence of symptoms across all measures of distress. A random forest machine learning algorithm was used to identify the strongest predictors of distress. Regression trees were developed to identify individuals at greater risk for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Somatization and less reliance on adaptive defense mechanisms were associated with greater distress. These findings highlight the importance of assessing individuals' physical experiences of psychological distress and emotion regulation strategies to help mental health providers tailor assessments and treatment during a global health crisis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] A scoping review of machine learning in psychotherapy research
    Aafjes-van Doorn, Katie
    Kamsteeg, Celine
    Bate, Jordan
    Aafjes, Marc
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2021, 31 (01) : 92 - 116
  • [2] Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review
    Aldao, Amelia
    Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
    Schweizer, Susanne
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) : 217 - 237
  • [3] Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People
    American Psychological Association
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 70 (09) : 832 - 864
  • [4] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders: DSM5, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, ANN INTERN MED
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, FRONT PSYCHIATRY
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1998, Rev. Gen. Psychol, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271, 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271]
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY
  • [10] Comparison and change of defense mechanisms over the course of psychotherapy in patients with depression or anxiety disorder: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial
    Bab, Anna
    Holtforth, Martin Grosse
    Perry, John Christopher
    Schneider, Noemi
    Dommann, Eliane
    Heer, Sara
    Stali, Annabarbara
    Aeschbacher, Nadine
    Eggel, Michaela
    Eggenberg, Jelena
    Sonntag, Meret
    Berger, Thomas
    Caspar, Franz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 252 : 212 - 220