Temporal and spatial dynamics of urea uptake and regeneration rates and concentrations in Chesapeake Bay

被引:70
作者
Lomas, MW
Trice, TM
Glibert, PM
Bronk, DA
McCarthy, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Horn Point Lab, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA
[2] Coll William & Mary, Sch Marine Sci, Dept Phys Sci, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Museum Comparat Zool, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
ESTUARIES | 2002年 / 25卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02695988
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We examined the temporal and spatial variability of urea concentrations and urea uptake and regeneration rates collected on cruises along the longitudinal axis of the Chesapeake Bay between 1972 and 1998. Interannually, mean Bay-Aide surface urea concentrations ranged between 0.49 and 0.91 mug-at N 1(-1) with a nearly 50% decrease in surface concentrations observed between 1988 and 1998. Concentrations of urea from samples collected within similar to1 m of the bottom were generally higher and much more variable than surface samples. Seasonally, two different patterns were observed in mean Bay-wide surface urea concentrations. Urea concentrations from near surface waters exhibited a clear summer peak for 1988 through 1994, while for 1973 and 1996 to 1998 a distinct winter-spring peak in concentration was observed. Urea concentrations from deeper waters showed a similar seasonal trend each year with peak concentrations measured in spring. Spatially, urea concentrations in the surface waters decreased in a conservative-type pattern from 0.91 mug-at N 1(-1) at the freshwater end member to 0.46 mug-at N 1(-1) at the ocean end member. Mean Bay-wide surface urea uptake rates displayed a seasonal pattern throughout the data set with maximum uptake rates (up to 0.33 mug-at N 1(-1) h(-1)) consistently observed during summer. Mean Bay-Aide surface regeneration rates were highest but most variable during fall (1.63 +/- 0.82 mug-at N 1(-1) h(-1)). Mean urea uptake and regeneration rates displayed opposing spatial trends along the axis of the Bay with uptake rates being lowest in the North Bay where regeneration rates were highest. The average temporal and spatial patterns of area concentration in Chesapeake Bay appear to reflect a balance between external inputs and internal biological recycling.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 482
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   THE ROLE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC NITROGEN IN PHYTOPLANKTON NUTRITION, CELL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY [J].
ANTIA, NJ ;
HARRISON, PJ ;
OLIVEIRA, L .
PHYCOLOGIA, 1991, 30 (01) :1-89
[2]   UREA IN WATERS OF LAKE KINNERET (SEA OF GALILEE) [J].
BERMAN, T .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1974, 19 (06) :977-980
[3]  
BIGGS RB, 1981, ESTUARIES NUTRIENTS, P3
[4]  
Boicourt W.C., 1992, OXYGEN DYNAMICS CHES, P7
[5]  
BOYNTON W, UNPUB
[6]   NUTRIENT REGENERATION AND OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION BY SEDIMENTS ALONG AN ESTUARINE SALINITY GRADIENT [J].
BOYNTON, WR ;
KEMP, WM .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1985, 23 (01) :45-55
[7]   INPUTS, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND TRANSPORT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY AND SELECTED TRIBUTARIES [J].
BOYNTON, WR ;
GARBER, JH ;
SUMMERS, R ;
KEMP, WM .
ESTUARIES, 1995, 18 (1B) :285-314
[8]   NITROGEN UPTAKE, DISSOLVED ORGANIC NITROGEN RELEASE, AND NEW PRODUCTION [J].
BRONK, DA ;
GLIBERT, PM ;
WARD, BB .
SCIENCE, 1994, 265 (5180) :1843-1846
[9]   Inorganic and organic nitrogen cycling in Chesapeake Bay: autotrophic versus heterotrophic processes and relationships to carbon flux [J].
Bronk, DA ;
Glibert, PM ;
Malone, TC ;
Banahan, S ;
Sahlsten, E .
AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 15 (02) :177-189
[10]  
Caron D.A., 1990, P283