Assessment of patient-reported clinical outcome in pancreatic and other hepatobiliary cancers: The FACT hepatobiliary symptom index

被引:62
作者
Yount, S
Cella, D
Webster, K
Heffernan, N
Chang, CH
Odom, L
van Gool, R
机构
[1] Evanston NW Healthcare, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Janssen Res Fdn, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium
关键词
quality of life; cancer; symptoms; hepatobiliary cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00422-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study's aim was to develop and validate a symptom. index derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary, a questionnaire measuring general and hepatobiliary disease specific aspects of quality of life. The item pool was narrowed to 26 questions that assess symptoms and junction. Each of 95 hepatobiliary cancer experts narrowed the list to 5 of the most important to attend to when treating advanced, hepatobiliar disease. Eight symptoms were endorsed by more than. 20% of the experts (3 pain, 2 fatigue, nausea, weight loss, jaundice) and were named the FACT-Hepatobiliary Symptom Index-8 (FHSI-8). Among 51 hepatobiliary cancer patients, the FHS1-8 showed good internal consistency (0.79), test-retest reliability (r = 0.86), strong association with mood (r = -0.56), and patient differentiation by ECOG Performance Status Rating (P < 0.0001) and treatment status (P = 0.057). Symptom scaling in diseases such as hepatobiliary cancer is feasible and efficient, clinically-relevant endpoint for following groups over time.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 44
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[3]  
Andrich D., 1978, Applied Psychological Measurement, V2, P581, DOI DOI 10.1177/014662167800200413
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NIH PUB
[5]  
BEAZLEY RM, 1995, CLIN ONCOLOGY, P251
[6]  
BERNHARD J, 1998, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, P324
[7]  
Bezjak A, 1998, Cancer Prev Control, V2, P230
[8]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[9]   Science, language, intuition, and the many meanings of quality of life [J].
Browman, GP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1651-1653
[10]   Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Burris, HA ;
Moore, MJ ;
Andersen, J ;
Green, MR ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Madiano, MR ;
Cripps, MC ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Storniolo, AM ;
Tarassoff, P ;
Nelson, R ;
Dorr, FA ;
Stephens, CD ;
VanHoff, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2403-2413