The future is now: Technology's impact on the practice of genetic counseling

被引:35
作者
Gordon, Erynn S. [1 ]
Babu, Deepti [2 ]
Laney, Dawn A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Genome Med, 95 3rd St, San Francisco, CA 94103 USA
[2] ThinkGenetic Inc, Waynesboro, VA USA
[3] Emory Sch Med, Dept Human Genet, Decatur, GA USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; clinical decision-support system; genetic counseling; natural language processing; risk assessment; technology; SERVICE DELIVERY MODELS; CANCER-RISK; BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; LYNCH-SYNDROME; PREDICTION; RADIOLOGISTS; MUTATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.c.31599
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Smartphones, artificial intelligence, automation, digital communication, and other types of technology are playing an increasingly important role in our daily lives. It is no surprise that technology is also shaping the practice of medicine, and more specifically the practice of genetic counseling. While digital tools have been part of the practice of medical genetics for decades, such as internet- or CD-ROM-based tools like Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man and Pictures of Standard Syndromes and Undiagnosed Malformations in the 1980s, the potential for emerging tools to change how we practice and the way patients consume information is startling. Technology has the potential to aid in at-risk patient identification, assist in generating a differential diagnosis, improve efficiency in medical history collection and risk assessment, provide educational support for patients, and streamline follow-up. Here we review the historic and current uses of technology in genetic counseling, identify challenges to integration, and propose future applications of technology that can shape the practice of genetic counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, SOURCES HLTH INFOR 2
  • [2] Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome
    Balmana, Judith
    Stockwell, David H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Deffenbaugh, Amie M.
    Reid, Julia E.
    Ward, Brian
    Scholl, Thomas
    Hendrickson, Brant
    Tazelaar, John
    Burbidge, Lynn Anne
    Syngal, Sapna
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (12): : 1469 - 1478
  • [3] Bass H.N., 2002, AM J HUM GENET, V71, P687
  • [4] Characteristics associated with genetic counseling referral and BRCA1/2 testing among women in a large integrated health system
    Bellcross, Cecelia A.
    Peipins, Lucy A.
    McCarty, Frances A.
    Rodriguez, Juan L.
    Hawkins, Nikki A.
    Alford, Sharon Hensley
    Leadbetter, Steven
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [5] Bennett R.L., 2010, PRACTICAL GUIDE GENE, V2nd
  • [6] Bennett Robin L, 2008, J Genet Couns, V17, P424, DOI 10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9
  • [7] Bessen J., 2015, LEARNING DOING REAL
  • [8] Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review
    Buchanan, Adam Hudson
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Williams, Janter L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6
  • [9] Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome
    Chen, Sining
    Wang, Wenyi
    Lee, Shing
    Nafa, Khedoudja
    Lee, Johanna
    Romans, Kathy
    Watson, Patrice
    Gruber, Stephen B.
    Euhus, David
    Kinzler, Kenneth W.
    Jass, Jeremy
    Gallinger, Steven
    Lindor, Noralane M.
    Casey, Graham
    Ellis, Nathan
    Giardiello, Francis M.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Parmigiani, Giovanni
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (12): : 1479 - 1487
  • [10] National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer
    Childers, Christopher P.
    Childers, Kimberly K.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    Macinko, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (34) : 3800 - +