What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model

被引:156
作者
Quoc Dinh Nguyen [1 ]
Fernandez, Nicolas [2 ]
Karsenti, Thierry [3 ]
Charlin, Bernard [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec, Dept Educ & Specialist Training, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Dept Educ Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Ctr Appl Teaching Hlth Sci CPASS, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
TEACHER-EDUCATION; MEDICAL-PRACTICE;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12583
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ContextAlthough reflection is considered a significant component of medical education and practice, the literature does not provide a consensual definition or model for it. Because reflection has taken on multiple meanings, it remains difficult to operationalise. A standard definition and model are needed to improve the development of practical applications of reflection. ObjectivesThis study was conducted in order to identify, explore and analyse the most influential conceptualisations of reflection, and to develop a new theory-informed and unified definition and model of reflection. MethodsA systematic review was conducted to identify the 15 most cited authors in papers on reflection published during the period from 2008 to 2012. The authors' definitions and models were extracted. An exploratory thematic analysis was carried out and identified seven initial categories. Categories were clustered and reworded to develop an integrative definition and model of reflection, which feature core components that define reflection and extrinsic elements that influence instances of reflection. ResultsFollowing our review and analysis, five core components of reflection and two extrinsic elements were identified as characteristics of the reflective thinking process. Reflection is defined as the process of engaging the self (S) in attentive, critical, exploratory and iterative (ACEI) interactions with one's thoughts and actions (TA), and their underlying conceptual frame (CF), with a view to changing them and a view on the change itself (VC). Our conceptual model consists of the defining core components, supplemented with the extrinsic elements that influence reflection. ConclusionsThis article presents a new theory-informed, five-component definition and model of reflection. We believe these have advantages over previous models in terms of helping to guide the further study, learning, assessment and teaching of reflection.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1189
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1933, RESTATEMENT RELATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], PORTFOLIOS PERSONAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RES DESIGN QUALITATI
[4]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE INCR
[5]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective
[6]   REFLECTION - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
ATKINS, S ;
MURPHY, K .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1993, 18 (08) :1188-1192
[7]   The development of a scale to measure personal reflection in medical practice and education [J].
Aukes, Leo C. ;
Geertsma, Jelle ;
Cohen-Schotanus, Janke ;
Zwierstra, Rein P. ;
Slaets, Joris P. J. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (2-3) :177-182
[8]  
Bengtsson J., 1995, TEACH TEACH, V1, P23, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1354060950010103, 10.1080/1354060950010103]
[9]   The Use of Reflection in Emergency Medicine Education [J].
Bernard, Aaron W. ;
Gorgas, Diane ;
Greenberger, Sarah ;
Jacques, Andrew ;
Khandelwal, Sorabh .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (08) :978-982
[10]   Assessing student reflection in medical practice. The development of an observer-rated instrument: reliability, validity and initial experiences [J].
Boenink, AD ;
Oderwald, AK ;
de Jonge, P ;
van Tilburg, W ;
Smal, JA .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 38 (04) :368-377