Risk Factors for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

被引:10
作者
Ponce, Jordi [1 ]
Fernandez-Gonzalez, Sergi [1 ]
Gil-Moreno, Antonio [2 ]
Coronado, Pluvio J. [3 ]
De la Rosa, Jesus [4 ]
Nabais, Henrique [5 ]
Hernandez, Gines [6 ]
Taltavull, Anna [7 ]
Gilabert-Estelles, Juan [8 ]
Martinez-Roman, Sergio [9 ]
Barahona, Manel [10 ]
Barahona, Marc [1 ]
Martinez-Maestre, Maria Angeles [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bellvitge IDIBELL, Dept Gynecol, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Salud Mujer, IdISSC, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Basurto, Dept Gynecol, Bilbao 48013, Spain
[5] Champalimaud Fdn, Dept Gynecol, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Hosp Univ Quironsalud, Dept Gynecol, Madrid 28223, Spain
[7] Hosp Univ Josep Trueta, Dept Gynecol, Girona 17007, Spain
[8] Univ Valencia, Hosp Gen Univ Valencia, Dept Gynecol, Valencia 46014, Spain
[9] Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Dept Gynecol, Barcelona 08916, Spain
[10] Univ Hosp Puerto Real, Dept Gynecol, Cadiz 11510, Spain
[11] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Dept Gynecol, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
early-stage cervical cancer; robotic surgery; radical hysterectomy; oncological outcome; recurrence; SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/cancers12113387
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary In 239 women with early-stage cervical cancer (<= IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009) undergoing robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Spanish and Portuguese centers between 2009 and 2018, the overall survival rate was 94.1% after a median follow-up of 51 months. Recurrence was diagnosed in 26 patients. In the multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were tumor size > 20 mm, adenocarcinoma as histological type, presence of positive pelvic lymph nodes, tumor grades 2 and 3, and not performing sentinel lymph node biopsy. The present oncological and surgical results surpassed the target of quality indicators in cervical cancer proposed by the European Society of Gynecology Oncology. When selecting a robot-assisted surgical approach to perform radical hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of primary early-stage cervical cancer, it is recommended to take into account the tumor grade and histological type, results of the sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the size of the tumor. This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the risk factors for recurrence in patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer (<= IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009) undergoing robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Spain and Portugal between 2009 and 2018. A second primary objective was to audit the oncological outcomes according to quality indicators (QI) proposed by the European Society of Gynecology Oncology (ESGO). The study population included 239 women. After a median follow-up of 51 months, recurrence occurred in 26 patients (10.9%). Independent factors for recurrence were clinical tumor size > 20 mm (hazard ratio (HR) 2.37), adenocarcinoma as histological type (HR 2.51), positive pelvic lymph nodes (HR 4.83), tumor grade 2 (HR 4.99), tumor grade 3 (HR 8.06), and having not performed sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) (HR 4.08). All 5 QI selected were surpassed by our results. In patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing robotic radical hysterectomy, clinicians should be aware that tumor grade 2 and 3, tumor size > 20 mm, adenocarcinoma, positive pelvic nodes, and lack of performance of SLNB are risk factors for recurrence. Fulfillment of QI targets of the ESGO might be considered as an objective oncological outcome indicator supporting the minimally invasive approach for early-stage cervical cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Surgical techniques:: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci® surgical system [J].
Advincula, A. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2006, 2 (04) :305-311
[2]   No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study [J].
Alfonzo, Emilia ;
Wallin, Emelie ;
Ekdahl, Linnea ;
Staf, Christian ;
Radestad, Angelique Floter ;
Reynisson, Petur ;
Stalberg, Karin ;
Falconer, Henrik ;
Persson, Jan ;
Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 116 :169-177
[3]   Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Weiderpass, Elisabete ;
Bruni, Laia ;
de Sanjose, Silvia ;
Saraiya, Mona ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Bray, Freddie .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (02) :E191-E203
[4]   Cancer of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Aoki, Daisuke ;
Sharma, Daya Nand ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 :22-36
[5]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[6]  
British Gynaecological Cancer Society National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NAT CANC REG AN SERV
[7]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[8]   Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm [J].
Chen, Xu ;
Zhao, Na ;
Ye, Piaopiao ;
Chen, Jiahua ;
Nan, Xingwei ;
Zhao, Hongqin ;
Zhou, Kai ;
Zhang, Yuyang ;
Xue, Jisen ;
Zhou, Haihong ;
Shang, Huiling ;
Zhu, Hanxiao ;
Leanne, Van der Merwe ;
Yan, Xiaojian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (05) :564-571
[9]   SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer [J].
Chiva, Luis ;
Zanagnolo, Vanna ;
Querleu, Denis ;
Martin-Calvo, Nerea ;
Arevalo-Serrano, Juan ;
Capilna, Mihai Emil ;
Fagotti, Anna ;
Kucukmetin, Ali ;
Mom, Constantijne ;
Chakalova, Galina ;
Aliyev, Shamistan ;
Malzoni, Mario ;
Narducci, Fabrice ;
Arencibia, Octavio ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco ;
Toptas, Tayfun ;
Cibula, David ;
Kaidarova, Dilyara ;
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu ;
Tavares, Mariana ;
Golub, Dmytro ;
Perrone, Anna Myriam ;
Poka, Robert ;
Tsolakidis, Dimitrios ;
Vujic, Goran ;
Jedryka, Marcin A. ;
Zusterzeel, Petra L. M. ;
Beltman, Jogchum Jan ;
Goffin, Frederic ;
Haidopoulos, Dimitrios ;
Haller, Herman ;
Jach, Robert ;
Yezhova, Iryna ;
Berlev, Igor ;
Bernardino, Margarida ;
Bharathan, Rasiah ;
Lanner, Maximilian ;
Maenpaa, Minna M. ;
Sukhin, Vladyslav ;
Feron, Jean-Guillaume ;
Fruscio, Robert ;
Kukk, Kersti ;
Ponce, Jordi ;
Minguez, Jose Angel ;
Vazquez-Vicente, Daniel ;
Castellanos, Teresa ;
Chacon, Enrique ;
Alcazar, Juan Luis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (09) :1269-1277
[10]   European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer [J].
Cibula, David ;
Planchamp, Francois ;
Fischerova, Daniela ;
Fotopoulou, Christina ;
Kohler, Christhardt ;
Landoni, Fabio ;
Mathevet, Patrice ;
Naik, Raj ;
Ponce, Jordi ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco ;
Rodolakis, Alexandros ;
Tamussino, Karl ;
Taskiran, Cagatay ;
Vergote, Ignace ;
Wimberger, Pauline ;
Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl ;
Querleu, Denis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (01) :3-14