Implementing Electronic Health Care Predictive Analytics: Considerations And Challenges

被引:116
作者
Amarasingham, Ruben [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Patzer, Rachel E. [4 ,5 ]
Huesch, Marco [6 ]
Nguyen, Nam Q. [1 ]
Xie, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] PCCI, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[6] Univ So Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
PROGNOSIS RESEARCH; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0352
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of predictive modeling for real-time clinical decision making is increasingly recognized as a way to achieve the Triple Aim of improving outcomes, enhancing patients' experiences, and reducing health care costs. The development and validation of predictive models for clinical practice is only the initial step in the journey toward mainstream implementation of real-time point-of-care predictions. Integrating electronic health care predictive analytics (e-HPA) into the clinical work flow, testing e-HPA in a patient population, and subsequently disseminating e-HPA across US health care systems on a broad scale require thoughtful planning. Input is needed from policy makers, health care executives, researchers, and practitioners as the field evolves. This article describes some of the considerations and challenges of implementing e-HPA, including the need to ensure patients' privacy, establish a health system monitoring team to oversee implementation, incorporate predictive analytics into medical education, and make sure that electronic systems do not replace or crowd out decision making by physicians and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1154
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Royston, Patrick
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1432 - 1435
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, BEST CARE LOWER COST, DOI [DOI 10.17226/13444, 10.17226/13444]
  • [3] The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Nolan, Thomas W.
    Whittington, John
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) : 759 - 769
  • [4] CMS.gov, EHR INC PROGR INT
  • [5] CMS.gov, READM RED PROGR INT
  • [6] PROVIDER BEHAVIOR UNDER PROSPECTIVE REIMBURSEMENT - COST-SHARING AND SUPPLY
    ELLIS, RP
    MCGUIRE, TG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1986, 5 (02) : 129 - 151
  • [7] Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes
    Hemingway, Harry
    Croft, Peter
    Perel, Pablo
    Hayden, Jill A.
    Abrams, Keith
    Timmis, Adam
    Briggs, Andrew
    Udumyan, Ruzan
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roberts, Ian
    Schroter, Sara
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Riley, Richard D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [8] Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research
    Hingorani, Aroon D.
    van der Windt, Danielle A.
    Riley, Richard D.
    Abrams, Keith
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Schroter, Sara
    Sauerbrei, Willi
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Hemingway, Harry
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [9] IBM Software Group, 2013, U TEX MD AND CANC CT
  • [10] Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee in Quality of Health Care in America, 2001, CROSSING QUALITY CHA, DOI DOI 10.17226/10027