Histological quality of polyps resected using the cold versus hot biopsy technique

被引:39
作者
Mönkemüller, KE
Fry, LC
Jones, BH
Wells, C
Mikolaenko, I
Eloubeidi, M
机构
[1] Vet Assoc Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Vet Assoc Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-814321
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims: The monopolar hot biopsy technique is a widespread method of removing and cauterizing small colonic polyps. Due to the insulated cups of the biopsy forceps, it also allows adequate histological interpretation of the resected specimen. In our experience, polyps removed using the monopolar hot biopsy technique have been less histologically interpretable in comparison with polyps removed using cold biopsy forceps. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic quality of polyps obtained using the hot biopsy and cold biopsy techniques. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy with removal of polyps using either hot biopsy or cold biopsy techniques. One experienced endoscopist using the same techniques carried out the biopsies. An experienced gastrointestinal pathologist, blinded to the technique used, evaluated the specimens for diameter, artifacts, cautery damage, tissue fragmentation, and general histological and diagnostic quality. Statistical analysis was carried out using the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and Student's t-test. Results: Forty-three consecutive patients (84% men; mean age 63.8 +/- 15 years) underwent 88 biopsies (45 hot biopsies and 43 cold biopsies). There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups with regard to demographic data, indications for colonoscopy, endoscopic findings, or polyp size. Cautery damage, architectural distortion, and tissue fragmentation occurred more frequently in polyps resected using the hot biopsy technique (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The quality of the specimens removed by cold biopsy was generally better than when using hot biopsy technique. Histological evaluation is more difficult in polyps resected with the hot biopsy technique in comparison with the cold biopsy technique. When the nature of polyps affects the patient's management, a biopsy may be obtained before polyp coagulation.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 436
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   LONG-TERM RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER EXCISION OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
MORSON, BC ;
CUZICK, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (10) :658-662
[2]  
BAILLIE J, 1997, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, P52
[3]   ENDOSCOPIC APPLICATIONS OF ELECTROSURGERY - A REVIEW OF BASIC PRINCIPLES [J].
BARLOW, DE .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1982, 28 (02) :73-76
[4]  
BOND JH, 1997, GASTROINTESTINAL DIS, P615
[5]   COMPARISON OF WEIGHT, DEPTH, AND DIAGNOSTIC ADEQUACY OF SPECIMENS OBTAINED WITH 16 DIFFERENT BIOPSY FORCEPS DESIGNED FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
DANESH, BJZ ;
BURKE, M ;
NEWMAN, J ;
AYLOTT, A ;
WHITFIELD, P ;
COTTON, PB .
GUT, 1985, 26 (03) :227-231
[6]   Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and Multibite forceps [J].
Fantin, AC ;
Neuweiler, J ;
Binek, JS ;
Suter, WR ;
Meyenberger, C .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (05) :600-604
[7]  
GILBERT DA, 1992, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V38, P753
[8]  
GRANQVIST S, 1979, ENDOSCOPY, V36, P1
[9]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF POLYPS IN THE RECTUM AND COLON - RECOVERY AND EVALUATION OF UNRESECTED POLYPS 2 YEARS AFTER DETECTION [J].
HOFF, G ;
FOERSTER, A ;
VATN, MH ;
SAUAR, J ;
LARSEN, S .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 21 (07) :853-862
[10]  
KIMMEY MB, 1988, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V34, P38