A Defence of Broome's First-Order Model of Practical Reasoning

In this paper I will consider criticisms that have been raised against Broome's first-order model of practical reasoning by Bratman, Brunero, and Hoj. I will modify Broome's exposition so that it is no longer vulnerable to these objections. The main modification I will make is that I will take the principle Broome dubs the "belief-intention link" to express a pragmatic implicature instead of a material implication, on the basis of which implicatures the process of reasoning Broome describes reaches the conclusion-states Broome desires to reach. This makes a cognitivist account of at least some norms of practical rationality plausible.