Utility-based optimization of phase II/III programs

被引:14
|
作者
Kirchner, Marietta [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
Goette, Heiko [2 ]
Schueler, Armin [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
optimization; expected utility; probability of success; program-wise planning; drug development; SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; III TRIAL; PORTFOLIOS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6624
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Phase II and phase III trials play a crucial role in drug development programs. They are costly and time consuming and, because of high failure rates in late development stages, at the same time risky investments. Commonly, sample size calculation of phase III is based on the treatment effect observed in phase II. Therefore, planning of phases II and III can be linked. The performance of the phase II/III program crucially depends on the allocation of the resources to phases II and III by appropriate choice of the sample size and the rule applied to decide whether to stop the program after phase II or to proceed. We present methods for a program-wise phase II/III planning that aim at determining optimal phase II sample sizes and go/no-go decisions in a time-to-event setting. Optimization is based on a utility function that takes into account (fixed and variable) costs of the drug development program and potential gains after successful launch. The proposed methods are illustrated by application to a variety of scenarios typically met in oncology drug development. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 316
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A utility-based performance metric for ROC analysis of N-class classification tasks
    Edwards, Darrin C.
    Metz, Charles E.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 6515
  • [42] Inefficiencies in phase II to phase III transition impeding successful drug development in glioblastoma
    Balasubramanian, Adithya
    Gunjur, Ashray
    Hafeez, Umbreen
    Menon, Siddharth
    Cher, Lawrence M.
    Parakh, Sagun
    Gan, Hui Kong
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [43] Seamless phase II/III designs
    Stallard, Nigel
    Todd, Susan
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (06) : 623 - 634
  • [44] Using phase II data for the analysis of phase III studies: An application in rare diseases
    Wandel, Simon
    Neuenschwander, Beat
    Roever, Christian
    Friede, Tim
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (03) : 277 - 285
  • [45] A multiple criteria utility-based approach for unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro
    Vieira, Bruno
    Viana, Ana
    Matos, Manuel
    Pedroso, Joao Pedro
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2016, 131 : 244 - 254
  • [46] Seamless phase II/III design: a useful strategy to reduce the sample size for dose optimization
    Jiang, Liyun
    Yuan, Ying
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (09): : 1092 - 1098
  • [47] Multi-objective multi-agent decision making: a utility-based analysis and survey
    Radulescu, Roxana
    Mannion, Patrick
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Nowe, Ann
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 34 (01)
  • [48] Stochastic utility-based flow control algorithm for services with time-varying rate requirements
    Kim, Byung-Gook
    Lee, Jang-Won
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2012, 56 (04) : 1329 - 1342
  • [49] Comparing the performance of two observers using a novel utility-based performance metric for ROC analysis
    Edwards, Darrin C.
    Metz, Charles E.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2009: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 7263
  • [50] Evaluation of Utility-Based Adaptive Resource and Power Allocation for Real Time Services in OFDMA Systems
    Melo, Yuri V. L.
    Rodrigues, Emanuel B.
    Lima, Rafael M.
    Maciel, Tarcisio F.
    Cavalcanti, Rodrigo P.
    2014 International Telecommunications Symposium (ITS), 2014,