Trade of woody biomass for electricity generation under climate mitigation policy

被引:24
|
作者
Favero, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Massetti, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei, I-30124 Venice, Italy
关键词
BECCS; Woody biomass trade; IAM; Negative emissions; Carbon market; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; LAND-USE; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; BIO-ENERGY; STORAGE; STABILIZATION; BIOENERGY; MODEL; SEQUESTRATION; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Bio-energy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS) has the potential to be a key mitigation option, because it can generate electricity and absorb emissions at the same time. However, biomass is not distributed evenly across the globe and regions with a potentially high demand might be constrained by limited domestic supply. Therefore, climate mitigation policies might create the incentive to trade biomass internationally. This paper uses scenarios generated by the integrated assessment model WITCH to study trade of woody biomass from multiple perspectives: the volume of biomass traded, its value, the impact on other power generation technologies and on the efficiency of mitigation policy. The policy scenarios consist of three representative carbon tax policies (4.8 W/m(2), 3.8 W/m(2) and 3.2 W/m(2) radiative forcing values in 2100) and a cap-and-trade scheme (3.8 W/m(2) in 2100). Results show that the incentive to trade biomass is high: at least 50% of biomass consumed globally is traded internationally. Regions trade 13-69 EJ/yr of woody biomass in 2050 and 55-81 EJ/yr in 2100. In 2100 the value of biomass traded is equal to US$ 0.7-7.2 Trillion. Trade of woody biomass substantially increases the efficiency of the mitigation policy. In the tax scenarios, abatement increases by 120-323 Gt CO2 over the century. In the cap-and-trade scenario biomass trade reduces the price of emission allowances by 34% in 2100 and cumulative discounted policy-costs by 14%. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 190
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas
    Klinsky, Sonja
    Dowlatabadi, Hadi
    McDaniels, Timothy
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (04): : 862 - 876
  • [42] Upgrading of woody biomass by torrefaction under pressure
    Wannapeera, Janewit
    Worasuwannarak, Nakorn
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2012, 96 : 173 - 180
  • [43] Substitutability and the Cost of Climate Mitigation Policy
    Lu, Yingying
    Stern, David I.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1622 - 1625
  • [44] A critique of climate change mitigation policy
    Somerville, Peter
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2020, 48 (02): : 355 - 378
  • [45] Substitutability and the Cost of Climate Mitigation Policy
    Yingying Lu
    David I. Stern
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 64 : 81 - 107
  • [46] Substitutability and the Cost of Climate Mitigation Policy
    Lu, Yingying
    Stern, David I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 (01): : 81 - 107
  • [47] A bridge too far? The role of natural gas electricity generation in US climate policy
    Woollacott, Jared
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 147
  • [48] International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change
    Wagner, Markus
    GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL, 2010, 5 (05): : 205 - 209
  • [49] The impact of technical efficiency, innovation, and climate policy on the economic viability of renewable electricity generation
    Lee, Jonathan M.
    Howard, Gregory
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 100
  • [50] A policy framework and industry roadmap model for sustainable oil palm biomass electricity generation in Malaysia
    Umar, Mohd Shaharin
    Urmee, Tania
    Jennings, Philip
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 128 : 275 - 284