Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention

被引:52
作者
Woestmann, Malte [1 ]
Vosskuhl, Johannes [2 ]
Obleser, Jonas [1 ]
Herrmann, Christoph S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychol, Maria Goeppert Str 9a, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, European Med Sch, Ctr Excellence Hearing4all, Expt Psychol Lab, Oldenburg, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Spatial attention; Auditory; Transcranial alternating current stimulation; Alpha; Gamma; Neural oscillation; ALTERNATING-CURRENT STIMULATION; BAND ACTIVITY; NEURAL OSCILLATIONS; EAR ADVANTAGE; SPEECH; MODULATION; DYNAMICS; REPRESENTATIONS; SYNCHRONIZATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Spatial attention relatively increases the power of neural 10-Hz alpha oscillations in the hemisphere ipsilateral to attention, and decreases alpha power in the contralateral hemisphere. For gamma oscillations (>40 Hz), the opposite effect has been observed. The functional roles of lateralised oscillations for attention are currently unclear. Hypothesis: If lateralised oscillations are functionally relevant for attention, transcranial stimulation of alpha versus gamma oscillations in one hemisphere should differentially modulate the accuracy of spatial attention to the ipsi-versus contralateral side. Methods: 20 human participants performed a dichotic listening task under continuous transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS, vs sham) at alpha (10 Hz) or gamma (47 Hz) frequency. On each trial, participants attended to four spoken numbers on the left or right ear, while ignoring numbers on the other ear. In order to stimulate a left temporo-parietal cortex region, which is known to show marked modulations of alpha power during auditory spatial attention, tACS (1 mA peak-to-peak amplitude) was applied at electrode positions TP7 and FC5 over the left hemisphere. Results: As predicted, unihemispheric alpha-tACS relatively decreased the recall of targets contralateral to stimulation, but increased recall of ipsilateral targets. Importantly, this spatial pattern of results was reversed for gamma-tACS. Conclusions: Results provide a proof of concept that transcranially stimulated oscillations can enhance spatial attention and facilitate attentional selection of speech. Furthermore, opposite effects of alpha versus gamma stimulation support the view that states of high alpha are incommensurate with active neural processing as reflected by states of high gamma. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 758
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Optimized auditory transcranial alternating current stimulation improves individual auditory temporal resolution [J].
Baltus, Alina ;
Wagner, Sven ;
Wolters, Carsten Hermann ;
Herrmann, Christoph Siegfried .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (01) :118-124
[2]   Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas [J].
Bauer, M ;
Oostenveld, R ;
Peeters, M ;
Fries, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (02) :490-501
[3]   Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias [J].
Benwell, Christopher S. Y. ;
Learmonth, Gemma ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Harvey, Monika ;
Thut, Gregor .
CORTEX, 2015, 69 :152-165
[4]   Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations? [J].
Brignani, Debora ;
Ruzzoli, Manuela ;
Mauri, Piercarlo ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02)
[5]   A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation [J].
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky ;
Amadera, Joao ;
Berbel, Bruna ;
Volz, Magdalena Sarah ;
Rizzerio, Brenno Gomes ;
Fregni, Felipe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 14 (08) :1133-1145
[6]   The Dichotic Right Ear Advantage Does not Change with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) [J].
D'Anselmo, Anita ;
Prete, Giulia ;
Tommasi, Luca ;
Brancucci, Alfredo .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (06) :1238-1240
[7]   Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back [J].
Dayan, Eran ;
Censor, Nitzan ;
Buch, Ethan R. ;
Sandrini, Marco ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 16 (07) :838-844
[8]   Concurrent brain-stimulation and neuroimaging for studies of cognition [J].
Driver, Jon ;
Blankenburg, Felix ;
Bestmann, Sven ;
Vanduffel, Wim ;
Ruff, Christian C. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (07) :319-327
[9]   Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms [J].
Fertonani, Anna ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2017, 23 (02) :109-123
[10]   Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention [J].
Fries, P ;
Reynolds, JH ;
Rorie, AE ;
Desimone, R .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5508) :1560-1563