Ethics for Development Research

被引:1
作者
Keahey, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
development ethics; research methods; human development; participatory development; sustainable development; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; PARTICIPATION; DIMENSIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; POLITICS; SOUTH;
D O I
10.1525/sod.2020.6.4.395
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Development ethics emerged as a joint critique of economic development research and practice, giving rise to three alternative traditions: human development, sustainable development, and participatory development. The ethical issues surrounding the mainstreaming of these schools have implications for investigators. In this article, I revisit the transformative values at the root of these traditions to articulate common research principles for an international and interdisciplinary field. Ethicists are asking development researchers to deliver actionable and multiparadigmatic understanding by improving measures, aligning values and approaches, and decolonizing knowledge. While these emerging research models can strengthen development relevancy and impact, they are challenging to facilitate and vulnerable to elite co-optation. Not only should the production of knowledge be rigorous and accurate, but scholars also have a responsibility to query power and embrace difference. The principles presented in this article comprise a set of shared values that may be used as a practical guide for planning, conducting, and evaluating development research across methods, topics, and disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 416
页数:22
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [51] Crafting new democratic spaces: participatory policy-making in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Hicks, Janine
    Buccus, Imraan
    [J]. TRANSFORMATION-CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2008, 65 : 94 - 119
  • [52] The inner dimension of sustainability: personal and cultural values
    Horlings, L. G.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 14 : 163 - 169
  • [53] Hussein A., 2009, Journal of Comparative Social Work, V4, P106, DOI [10.31265/jcsw.v4i1.48, DOI 10.31265/JCSW.V4I1.48]
  • [54] Feminism spoken here: Epistemologies for interdisciplinary development research
    Jackson, Cecile
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2006, 37 (03) : 525 - 547
  • [55] Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research
    Janes, Julia E.
    [J]. ACTION RESEARCH, 2016, 14 (01) : 72 - 87
  • [56] Participatory development, complicity and desire
    Kapoor, I
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2005, 26 (08) : 1203 - 1220
  • [57] Keahey Jennifer, 2019, ACTION RES
  • [58] Farming for change: developing a participatory curriculum on agroecology, nutrition, climate change and social equity in Malawi and Tanzania
    Kerr, Rachel Bezner
    Young, Sera L.
    Young, Carrie
    Santoso, Marianne V.
    Magalasi, Mufunanji
    Entz, Martin
    Lupafya, Esther
    Dakishoni, Laifolo
    Morrone, Vicki
    Wolfe, David
    Snapp, Sieglinde S.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2019, 36 (03) : 549 - 566
  • [59] Krushil y WATENE., 2015, Journal of Global Ethics, V11, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1080/17449626.2015.1010099, 10.1080/17449626.2015.1010099]
  • [60] The Idea of Universality in the Sustainable Development Goals
    Long, Graham
    [J]. ETHICS & INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2015, 29 (02) : 203 - 222