Ethics for Development Research

被引:1
作者
Keahey, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
development ethics; research methods; human development; participatory development; sustainable development; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; PARTICIPATION; DIMENSIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; POLITICS; SOUTH;
D O I
10.1525/sod.2020.6.4.395
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Development ethics emerged as a joint critique of economic development research and practice, giving rise to three alternative traditions: human development, sustainable development, and participatory development. The ethical issues surrounding the mainstreaming of these schools have implications for investigators. In this article, I revisit the transformative values at the root of these traditions to articulate common research principles for an international and interdisciplinary field. Ethicists are asking development researchers to deliver actionable and multiparadigmatic understanding by improving measures, aligning values and approaches, and decolonizing knowledge. While these emerging research models can strengthen development relevancy and impact, they are challenging to facilitate and vulnerable to elite co-optation. Not only should the production of knowledge be rigorous and accurate, but scholars also have a responsibility to query power and embrace difference. The principles presented in this article comprise a set of shared values that may be used as a practical guide for planning, conducting, and evaluating development research across methods, topics, and disciplines.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 416
页数:22
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [11] Brydon-Miller M., 2003, Action Research, V1, P9, DOI [DOI 10.1177/14767503030011002, 10.1177/14767503030011002]
  • [12] Bringing the "Missing Pillar" into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators
    Burford, Gemma
    Hoover, Elona
    Velasco, Ismael
    Janouskova, Svatava
    Jimenez, Alicia
    Piggot, Georgia
    Podger, Dimity
    Harder, Marie K.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (07) : 3035 - 3059
  • [13] Cahill C, 2007, ACME, V6, P304
  • [14] Partnerships for social change in the Canadian North: Revisiting the insider-outsider dialectic
    Caine, Ken J.
    Salomons, M. J.
    Simmons, Deborah
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2007, 38 (03) : 447 - 471
  • [15] As well as the subject: Additional dimensions in development research ethics
    Camfield, Laura
    Palmer-Jones, Richard
    [J]. PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2013, 13 (04)
  • [16] Toward a Critical Youth Policy Praxis: Critical Youth Studies and Participatory Action Research
    Cerecer, David Alberto Quijada
    Cahill, Caitlin
    Bradley, Matt
    [J]. THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2013, 52 (03) : 216 - 223
  • [17] PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA) - CHALLENGES, POTENTIALS AND PARADIGM
    CHAMBERS, R
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 22 (10) : 1437 - 1454
  • [18] Inclusive rigour for complexity
    Chambers, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 2015, 7 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [19] Chilisa B., 2009, The handbook of social research ethics, P407, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781483348971.N26
  • [20] Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm
    Chilisa, Bagele
    Major, Thenjiwe Emily
    Khudu-Petersen, Kelne
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (03) : 326 - 339