Regional bone loss following femoral neck fracture: A comparison between cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty

被引:13
作者
Vidovic, Dinko [1 ]
Punda, Marija [2 ]
Darabos, Nikica [3 ]
Bekavac-Beslin, Miroslav [1 ]
Bakota, Bore [4 ]
Matejcic, Aljosa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Sisters Mercy, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Reconstruct Surg, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Univ Hosp Sisters Mercy, Dept Oncol & Nucelar Med, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Sisters Mercy, Clin Traumatol, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[4] Gen Hosp Karlovac, Dept Surg, Karlovac 47000, Croatia
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2015年 / 46卷
关键词
Femoral neck fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Bone density; DEXA; Bone cements; Aged; UNCEMENTED HEMIARTHROPLASTY; HIP HEMIARTHROPLASTY; BIPOLAR; RISK; REPLACEMENT; MORTALITY; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.069
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective, randomised study was to measure and evaluate regional bone mineral changes and clinical results following the use of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty (HA) for treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. The study comprised 60 patients, 30 with cemented HA (group A) and 30 with cementless HA (group B). All patients underwent osteodensitometry of the contralateral hip, lumbar spine and bilateral distal femur. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was scheduled at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for functional assessment. Overall mortality rate was 20.3% within 1 year after surgery. There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay between the two groups of patients. The implantation of cemented prosthesis took statistically significantly longer than that of cementless prosthesis (79.03 +/- 3.59 vs 68.02 +/- 5.97 min; p = 0.00). Functional score in patients treated with cemented HA was significantly higher compared with those with cementless HA. There was a trend of less intensive reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) in regions of interest of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral distal femur in patients with cemented HA (group A), whereas bone loss was less pronounced for the contralateral hip and distal femur in patients treated with cementless HA (group B). Management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with cemented and cementless HA provides a comparable outcome with regard to morbidity and mortality; however, functional outcome of patients treated with cementless HA tends to be lower. There is less intensive BMD reduction in lumbar spine and ipsilateral distal femur in patients treated with cemented HA, whereas BMD reduction in patients treated with cementless HA is more likely to be less intensive in contralateral hip and distal femur. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S52 / S56
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INJURY
[2]   A comparison of the use of uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated bipolar and cemented femoral stems in the treatment of femoral neck fractures [J].
Bell, K. R. ;
Clement, N. D. ;
Jenkins, P. J. ;
Keating, J. F. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (03) :299-305
[3]   Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly [J].
Bezwada, HP ;
Shah, AR ;
Harding, SH ;
Baker, J ;
Johanson, NA ;
Mont, MA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (07) :73-77
[4]   Bipolar cemented hip hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture who are on hemodialysis is associated with risk of stem migration [J].
Blacha, Jan ;
Kolodziej, Robert ;
Karwanski, Marek .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 (02) :174-178
[5]   What should be the preferred choice of hemiarthroplasty technique in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III patients with femoral neck fractures? Cemented or cementless [J].
Cicek, Hakan ;
Seyfettinoglu, Firat ;
Kilicarslan, Kasim ;
Ogur, Hasan Ulas ;
Ozturk, Levent ;
Inkaya, Erkan .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (08) :1567-1570
[6]   Bone mineral density 6 years after a hip fracture: A prospective, longitudinal study [J].
Dirschl, DR ;
Piedrahita, L ;
Henderson, RC .
BONE, 2000, 26 (01) :95-98
[7]   BONE LOSS AFTER TIBIAL FRACTURE [J].
EYRES, KS ;
KANIS, JA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (03) :473-478
[8]   Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures [J].
Figved, Wender ;
Opland, Vidar ;
Frihagen, Frede ;
Jervidalo, Tore ;
Madsen, Jan Erik ;
Nordsletten, Lars .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (09) :2426-2435
[9]  
FINSEN V, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P261
[10]   CHANGES IN BONE-MASS AFTER TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURE [J].
FINSEN, V ;
HAAVE, O .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 58 (04) :369-371