Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic performance of RC bridge piers considering buckling and low-cycle fatigue of high-strength steel bars

被引:51
|
作者
Ding, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Dianqi [2 ]
Su, Junsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhong-Xian [1 ,2 ]
Zong, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Keyan [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Municapal Engn Design & Res Inst, Tianjin 300392, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
High-strength steel bars (HSSB); RC bridge piers; Seismic performance; Bar buckling; Low-cycle fatigue; CONCRETE FLEXURAL MEMBERS; SPECIAL MOMENT FRAMES; REINFORCEMENT; BEHAVIOR; COLUMNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111464
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to promote the application of high-strength steel bars (HSSB) in reinforced concrete (RC) bridge structures, the mechanical properties of HSSB as well as seismic performance of high-strength RC piers were investigated by experimental study and numerical analysis. First, monotonic and low cycle fatigue tests of HRB400E and HTRB600 steel with different slenderness ratios (L/D) were conducted to comparatively study their mechanical properties. Then, quasi-static cyclic tests of seven rectangular RC piers were conducted to study the effects of concrete cover, longitudinal reinforcement yield strength, concrete strength and axial load ratio on seismic behavior of RC piers. Finally, a fiber-based beam-column element was used to simulate the mechanical behavior of steel material and nonlinear response of RC piers. Material tests indicate that HTRB600 steel has lower uniform and fracture elongations, as well as inferior low-cycle fatigue performance than HRB400E steel. Increase of the slenderness ratio (L/D) severely weakens low-cycle fatigue life of steel bars, and the low-cycle fatigue parameters of steel can be fitted for each slenderness ratio, respectively. Even though HTRB600 steel has relatively lower ductility and inferior low-cycle fatigue performance, the RC piers with HTRB600 steel still have higher or at least comparable deformation capacity than that with HRB400E steel. This results from the reduction of strain demands of longitudinal bars by the utilization of HSSB in RC piers. Removing the concrete cover neighboring the longitudinal bars in the plastic hinge region has trivial impact on bar buckling and ultimate displacement of RC piers, which confirms that the concrete cover has already spalled off prior to the initiation of longitudinal reinforcement buckling. With identical steel strength and tie configuration, the ultimate displacement of RC pier with C80 concrete is significantly lower than that with C40 and C60 concrete, while the latter two have similar deformation capacity. Increase of axial load ratio (from 0.06 to 0.18) obviously reduces ultimate displacement of RC piers, since the concrete in the compression zone endures greater compressive stress under higher axial load and thus compressive failure occurs earlier. The ReinforcingSteel material model in OpenSees is calibrated by experimental data to accurately simulate the buckling and low-cycle fatigue properties of HRB400E and HTRB600 steel. The fiber-based finite element model (FEM) can predict the strain development of longitudinal bars of RC piers under cyclic loading, and the resulting low-cycle fatigue damage of steel material as well as strength degradation of RC piers. Combined with experimental study and FEM, this paper reveals the influence mechanisms of different factors on the seismic performance of RC piers in detail.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low-cycle fatigue performance of bimetallic steel bar considering the effect of inelastic buckling
    Wang, Fei
    Hua, Jianmin
    Xue, Xuanyi
    Ding, Ziheng
    Lyu, Yifan
    Liu, Qing
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 351
  • [22] Low-cycle fatigue performance of bimetallic steel bar considering the effect of inelastic buckling
    Wang, Fei
    Hua, Jianmin
    Xue, Xuanyi
    Ding, Ziheng
    Lyu, Yifan
    Liu, Qing
    Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 351
  • [23] Experimental and numerical investigations on cyclic behaviors of precast segmental bridge piers with the hybrid of high-strength bars and unbonded prestressing tendons
    Tong, Teng
    Yuan, Siqi
    Zhuo, Weiding
    Liu, Zhao
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (03) : 509 - 521
  • [24] STRUCTURAL-CHANGES IN HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL DURING LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE
    CHEKHOVOI, AI
    RUSSIAN METALLURGY, 1989, (06): : 105 - 112
  • [25] Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of 1100 MPa Grade High-Strength Steel
    Zhou Hongwei
    Bai Fengmei
    Yang Lei
    Chen Yan
    Fang Junfei
    Zhang Liqiang
    Yi Hailong
    He Yizhu
    ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA, 2020, 56 (07) : 937 - 948
  • [26] Seismic performance of RC bridge piers reinforced with varying yield strength steel
    Su, Junsheng
    Dhakal, Rajesh Prasad
    Wang, Junjie
    Wang, Wenbiao
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 (02) : 201 - 211
  • [27] Tensile and Low-Cycle Fatigue Properties of HTRB630 High-Strength Steel Bars after Exposure to High Temperatures
    Zhuang, Mei-Ling
    Gao, Li
    Sun, Chuanzhi
    Long, Hao
    Su, Shizhe
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 36 (02)
  • [28] Research on seismic resilience of prestressed precast segmental bridge piers reinforced with high-strength bars through experimental testing and numerical modelling
    Tong, Teng
    Zhuo, Weiding
    Jiang, Xiaofang
    Lei, Haipeng
    Liu, Zhao
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 197
  • [29] Tensile low-cycle fatigue performance and life prediction of high-strength bolts
    Zhang, Wenyuan
    Xie, Jingyi
    Li, Tongxin
    Ding, Yukun
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 197
  • [30] The Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of a High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Subjected to Tempforming
    Dolzhenko, Anastasiia
    Dolzhenko, Pavel
    Dudko, Valeriy
    Kaibyshev, Rustam
    Belyakov, Andrey
    MATERIALS, 2025, 18 (05)