Efficient transit network design and frequencies setting multi-objective optimization by alternating objective genetic algorithm

被引:128
作者
Arbex, Renato Oliveira [1 ]
da Cunha, Claudio Barbieri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Transportat Engn, Predio Engn Civil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Transit network design; Frequency setting problem; Genetic algorithm; Public transportation; Multi-objective optimization; ROUTE NETWORK; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SYSTEMS; TIMETABLES; SERVICE; DEMAND; LEVEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The multi-objective transit network design and frequency setting problem (TNDFSP) involves finding a set of routes and their associated frequencies to operate in an urban area public transport system. The TNDFSP is a difficult combinatorial optimization problem, with a large search space and multiple constraints, leading to numerous infeasible solutions. We propose an Alternating Objective Genetic Algorithm (AOGA) to efficiently solve it, in which the objective to be searched is cyclically alternated along the generations. The two objectives are to minimize both passengers' and operators' costs. Transit users' costs are related to the total number of transfers, waiting and in-vehicle travel times, while operator's costs are related to the total required fleet to operate the set of routes. Our proposed GA also employs local search procedures to properly deal with infeasibility of newly generated individuals, as well as of those mutated. Extensive computational experiments results are reported using both Mandl's original benchmark set and instances with different demands and travel times as well, in order to determine Pareto Frontiers of optimal solutions, given that users' and operators' costs are conflicting objectives. The results evidence that the AOGA is very efficient, leading to improved solutions when compared to previously published results. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 376
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Afandizadeh S, 2013, INT J CIV ENG, V11, P43
[2]  
[Anonymous], P ITRN 31 AUG 1 SEPT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J TRANSPORTATION ENG, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000126
[4]  
Baaj M.H., 1991, J. Adv. Transp, V25, P187, DOI [DOI 10.1002/ATR.5670250205, 10.1002/atr.5670250205]
[5]   Transit-network design methodology for actual-size road networks [J].
Bagloee, Saeed Asadi ;
Ceder, Avishai .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (10) :1787-1804
[6]   Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, J. A. Sarsfield .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (06) :478-489
[7]   Genetic algorithms in bus network optimization [J].
Bielli, M ;
Caramia, M ;
Carotenuto, P .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2002, 10 (01) :19-34
[8]   Implications of the computational complexity of transit route network redesign for metaheuristic optimisation systems [J].
Blum, J. J. ;
Mathew, T. V. .
IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2012, 6 (02) :124-131
[9]   METHODS FOR CREATING BUS TIMETABLES [J].
CEDER, A .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1987, 21 (01) :59-83
[10]   User and operator perspectives in transit network design [J].
Ceder, A ;
Israeli, Y .
TRANSIT: BUS, PARATRANSIT, RURAL, INTERMODAL, RAIL, COMMUTER AND INTERCITY RAIL, LIGHT RAIL, 1998, (1623) :3-7