What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?

被引:58
作者
Yadlapati, Rena [1 ]
Pandolfino, John E. [2 ]
Fox, Mark R. [3 ]
Bredenoord, Albert J. [4 ,5 ]
Kahrilas, Peter J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gastroenterol, Ctr Esophageal Dis, La Jolla, CA USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med, 676 St Clair St,14th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Klin Arlesheim, Lab & Clin Motil Disorders & Funct Digest Dis, Digest Funct Basel, Arlesheim, Switzerland
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
achalasia; esophageal motility; esophageal pressure topography; gastroesophageal reflux disease; per‐ oral endoscopic myotomy; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1111/nmo.14053
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Since publication of Chicago Classification version 3.0 in 2015, the clinical and research applications of high-resolution manometry (HRM) have expanded. In order to update the Chicago Classification, an International HRM Working Group consisting of 52 diverse experts worked for two years and utilized formally validated methodologies. Compared with the prior iteration, there are four key modifications in Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0). First, further manometric and non-manometric evaluation is required to arrive at a conclusive, actionable diagnosis of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO). Second, EGJOO, distal esophageal spasm, and hypercontractile esophagus are three manometric patterns that must be accompanied by obstructive esophageal symptoms of dysphagia and/or non-cardiac chest pain to be considered clinically relevant. Third, the standardized manometric protocol should ideally include supine and upright positions as well as additional manometric maneuvers such as the multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Solid test swallows, postprandial testing, and pharmacologic provocation can also be considered for particular conditions. Finally, the definition of ineffective esophageal motility is more stringent and now encompasses fragmented peristalsis. Hence, CCv4.0 no longer distinguishes between major versus minor motility disorders but simply separates disorders of EGJ outflow from disorders of peristalsis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography [J].
Bredenoord, A. J. ;
Fox, M. ;
Kahrilas, P. J. ;
Pandolfino, J. E. ;
Schwizer, W. ;
Smout, A. J. P. M. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 :57-65
[2]   Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice [J].
Fox, M. R. ;
Bredenoord, A. J. .
GUT, 2008, 57 (03) :405-423
[3]   High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy [J].
Gyawali, C. P. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 :2-4
[4]   The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0 [J].
Kahrilas, P. J. ;
Bredenoord, A. J. ;
Fox, M. ;
Gyawali, C. P. ;
Roman, S. ;
Smout, A. J. P. M. ;
Pandolfino, J. E. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2015, 27 (02) :160-174
[5]   High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities [J].
Pandolfino, J. E. ;
Fox, M. R. ;
Bredenoord, A. J. ;
Kahrilas, P. J. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2009, 21 (08) :796-806
[6]  
Sweis R, 2018, NEUROGASTROENT MOTIL, V30, P3