Divergent Bilateral Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Screw Fixation: Description of New Trajectory for Interbody Technique from Midline Exposure

被引:4
|
作者
Bohl, Michael A. [1 ]
Hlubek, Randall J. [1 ]
Kakarla, U. Kumar [1 ]
Chang, Steve W. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
关键词
Degenerative spine disease; Lumbar fusion; PLIF; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; PEDICLE SCREWS; ROD FIXATION; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; SPINE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.060
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A major drawback to use of cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws (CBTPSs) with traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion grafts is that traditional graft insertion trajectories require wider posterior exposure. This wider exposure, beyond the limits otherwise required for CBTPS placement, negates a primary benefit of CBTPS fixation. The aim of this study was to define an alternative surgical technique for interbody graft placement that, when used in conjunction with CBTPS fixation, permits both minimal soft tissue dissection and optimal graft placement. METHODS: A team of neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of spinal pathologies developed a surgical technique for insertion of bilateral PLIF grafts that complements the principles of CBTPS fixation. This technique is illustrated in a patient undergoing lumbosacral decompression, CBTPS fixation, and 3-column arthrodesis. RESULTS: The described technique uses a divergent trajectory of bilateral PLIF grafts rather than the traditional parallel or convergent trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: By aiming medially to laterally with the interbody graft, one recapitulates many advantages of CBTPSs, including avoidance of wide tissue dissection, greater intergraft volume available for bone grafting, and greater graft coverage of the hypophyseal ring. The prospective collection of outcome data for patients who undergo lumbosacral fusion using the divergent PLIF technique is ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:E480 / E485
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Kuroda, Yusuke
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [32] Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Godzik, Jakub
    Martinez-del-Campo, Eduardo
    Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
    Reis, Marco T.
    Perez-Orribo, Luis
    Whiting, Alexander C.
    Singh, Vaneet
    Kelly, Brian P.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 113 : E439 - E445
  • [33] Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
    Tan, Ying
    Tanaka, Masato
    Sonawane, Sumeet
    Uotani, Koji
    Oda, Yoshiaki
    Fujiwara, Yoshihiro
    Arataki, Shinya
    Yamauchi, Taro
    Takigawa, Tomoyuki
    Ito, Yasuo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [34] Posterior Lumbar Element Enforcement by Decompression Alone with Interspinous Fixation without Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Park, Hyun-Woong
    Han, Moon-Soo
    Jung, Ji-Ho
    Hong, Jong-Hwan
    Lee, Shin-Seok
    Lee, Jung-Kil
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2025, 68 (02) : 150 - 158
  • [35] Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with transpedicular screw fixation for isthmic spondylolithesis: a meta-analysis
    Yong-Ping Ye
    Hao Xu
    Dan Chen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2013, 133 : 1649 - 1655
  • [36] Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Vs. Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    He, Li-Ming
    Li, Jia-Rui
    Wu, Hao-Ran
    Chang, Qiang
    Guan, Xiao-Ming
    Ma, Zhuo
    Feng, Hao-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [37] Predictors of segmental lumbar lordosis following midline posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion: Does interbody device type matter?
    Crawford, Charles
    Epperson, Thomas
    Gum, Jeffrey
    Owens, R. Kirk
    Djurasovic, Mladen
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 11
  • [38] A microsurgical technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Technical note
    Kotilainen, E
    Kotilainen, P
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1999, 141 (07) : 767 - 769
  • [39] Factors Affecting Slip Reduction in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Fixation for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Chung, Nam-Su
    Lee, Han-Dong
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    Jeong, Seungmin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (08) : 1786 - 1791
  • [40] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hu, Xu-Qi
    Wu, Xin-Lei
    Xu, Cong
    Zheng, Xu-Hao
    Jin, Yong-Long
    Wu, Li-Jun
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):