Are R&D-Intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study

被引:56
作者
Fu, Limin [1 ,2 ]
Boehe, Dirk [3 ]
Orlitzky, Marc [4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Peter Faber Business Sch, 8-20 Napier St, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Business Sch, 10 Pulteney St, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Massey Univ, Business Sch, Albany Campus,Private Bag 102904, Auckland 0745, New Zealand
[4] Univ Warsaw, Fac Management, Warsaw, Poland
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Integration; Organizational knowledge; R&D intensity; Slack; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SLACK RESOURCES; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; MARKET COMPETITION; MODERATING ROLES; INNOVATION; CSR; INTEGRATION; RELATEDNESS; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2020.104082
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Seeking to obtain efficiency in the development and integration of knowledge about R&D and corporate social responsibility (CSR), firms face hard choices about their resource allocation to these two areas because of the specialized nature of knowledge and related barriers to integration. We address this organizational resource allocation dilemma by relaxing the common assumption that firms are either responsible or irresponsible and examining financial slack as a possible moderator. Using a multicountry sample of 1,957 firms over a 16-year timespan, we find strong empirical support for the positive association between firms' R&D intensity and CSR specialization, a novel concept that-distinct from CSR as such-gauges the extent to which firms specialize in specific environmental, social, or governance aspects of CSR. However, there is insufficient support for financial slack as a moderator in general (except for one noteworthy industry pattern and an alternative operationalization of slack). The exceptions suggest that the nature of organizational slack may influence the relationship between R&D and CSR specialization.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Related diversification and R&D intensity dynamics [J].
Alonso-Borrego, Cesar ;
Javier Forcadell, Francisco .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (04) :537-548
[2]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ISIC Rev. 3 Technology Intensity Definition, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 2017 ESSENTIAL FACTS, P1
[5]   Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies [J].
Antonioli, Davide ;
Mancinelli, Susanna ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (04) :975-988
[6]  
Appelt S., 2019, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, V2019, DOI [DOI 10.1787/D16E6072-EN, 10.1787/d16e6072-en]
[7]  
Arrow K., 1971, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing
[8]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[9]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[10]   Necessity as the mother of "green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) :891-909