Main Dynamics of Folklore Discipline: a Scientometric Analysis

被引:0
作者
Yalcin, Haydar [1 ]
Yayla, Kemal [2 ]
机构
[1] Katip Celebi Univ, Bilgi & Belge Yonetimi Bolumu, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Isletme Anabilim Dali, Izmir, Turkey
来源
MILLI FOLKLOR | 2016年 / 112期
关键词
Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Humanities; Folklore; Disciplinary Differences; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; HUMANITIES; CITATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
I27 [民间文学];
学科分类号
030304 ;
摘要
The aim of this research to determine the basic dynamics of folklore research and examine general characteristics of discipline with comparing the topics that studied in Turkey and international literature. In this context, growths of scientific knowledge and existing indexing system have been examined by Scientometric point of view. The literature of folklore studies has been evaluated with a hybrid approach that combined, social network analysis and text mining applications, bibliometric data and Scientometric laws which are both similar approach relationship and dynamics of field. Current trends of folklore publications and cultural heritage material classification seen that general framework of publication are closely related to folklore core publication journals. Our findings confirm that scientific cooperation between researchers' that are regularly published in folklore related journals and diversity of sources that are used in folklore. Considering this literature and its applications it seems that the interconnections in folklore between collaboration and multi-authored papers may be more complex than the others. Most of the authors works alone (%93), in other words according to the results of the study, in folklore researches single-authored papers predominate. A number of publications have reflected on the new collaborative possibilities that after the year 2010. However, looking to studies of collaborative publication patterns in folklore studies, it is clear that relatively little has been done on this from a quantitative perspective. The visualization of the network has shown that folklore publication dynamics are based on single authored papers. It can be, defined the folklore discipline is closed research area, based on reference sources.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 60
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] A searchable meta-graph can connect even troublesome house elves and other supernatural beings to scholarly folk categories.
    Abello, James
    Broadwell, Peter
    Tangherlini, Timothy R.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2012, 55 (07) : 60 - 70
  • [2] Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    Caprasecca, Alessandro
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) : 206 - 215
  • [3] Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors
    Al, Umut
    Sahiner, Mustafa
    Tonta, Yasar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (08): : 1011 - 1022
  • [4] Al U, 2010, BILIG, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, P 18 ACM C INF KNOWL, DOI DOI 10.1145/1645953.1646076
  • [6] [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION 1127
  • [7] A fast and efficient heuristic algorithm for detecting community structures in complex networks
    Chen, Duanbing
    Fu, Yan
    Shang, Mingsheng
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2009, 388 (13) : 2741 - 2749
  • [8] Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks
    Ding, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (01) : 187 - 203
  • [9] Ekici Metin., 2013, Halk Bilgisi (Folklor) Derleme ve Inceleme Yontemleri
  • [10] Esen M., 2016, EGITIM BILIM 0324, DOI 10.15390/EB.2016.6232