Clinical and Prognostic Features of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

被引:66
|
作者
Weinstock, Brett [1 ]
Ward, Stephen C. [2 ]
Harpaz, Noam [2 ]
Warner, Richard R. P. [1 ]
Itzkowitz, Steven [1 ]
Kim, Michelle Kang [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, New York, NY USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
关键词
Rectal neuroendocrine tumors; Carcinoids; Stage; Grade; Size; Prognosis; Survival; ENDOSCOPIC-SUBMUCOSAL-DISSECTION; CARCINOID-TUMORS; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; MUCOSAL-RESECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; SYSTEM; COLON;
D O I
10.1159/000355612
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are among the most common NETs. The aim was to validate European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS)/North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) staging and grading systems with regard to clinical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive database was constructed from existing databases of the Mount Sinai Division of Gastrointestinal Pathology and the Carcinoid Cancer Foundation. Analysis was performed on 141 patients identified with rectal NETs seen at Mount Sinai Hospital between 1972 and 2011. Results:The median age was 52.7 years; 43% were males. Average tumor size was 0.88 cm. NETs <1 cm accounted for 75.6% of the tumors. Stage I,II,III and IV accounted for 79.4, 2.8, 5.0 and 12.8% of the tumors, respectively. G1 tumors accounted for 88.1%, G2 8.3% and G3 3.6%. Of G1 tumors, 94.6% were stage 1 and 5.4% were stage IV. The median survival time for all 141 patients was 6.8 years (range, 0.8-34.7 years). The overall 5-year survival rate was 84.4%. The 5-year survival rates for patients in stages I-IV were 92.7, 75.0, 42.9 and 33.2%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for patients with G1-G3 tumors were 87.7, 47.6 and 33.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis of increased survival showed significance for lower stage, lower grade, smaller size, absence of symptoms and endoscopically treated tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that stage alone was statistically significant as the strongest predictor of survival. Conclusion: The results of our study validated ENETS/NANETS guidelines for staging and grading of rectal NETs in the US setting of a tertiary referral center. Staging according to ENETS/NANETS guidelines should be used in the treatment algorithm rather than size alone. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognostic Factors for Survival in Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Sohn, Beonghoon
    Kwon, Yoomin
    Ryoo, Seung-Bum
    Song, Inho
    Kwon, Yoon-Hye
    Lee, Dong Woon
    Moon, Sang Hui
    Park, Ji Won
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (12) : 2066 - 2074
  • [2] Frequent Presence of Lymphovascular Invasion in Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors on Immunohistochemical Analysis
    Kitagawa, Yoshiyasu
    Ikebe, Dai
    Suzuki, Takuto
    Hara, Taro
    Itami, Makiko
    Yamaguchi, Taketo
    DIGESTION, 2017, 95 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [3] Risk Factor Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Who Needs a Radical Resection in Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Sized 1-2 cm?
    Choi, Jin Sun
    Kim, Min Jung
    Shin, Rumi
    Park, Ji Won
    Heo, Seung Chul
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Park, Kyu Joo
    Ryoo, Seung-Bum
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2414 - 2424
  • [4] Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated Using Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with a Ligation Device
    Takita, Maiko
    Sakai, Eiji
    Nakao, Tomomi
    Kimoto, Yoshiaki
    Ishii, Rindo
    Konishi, Takafumi
    Ueno, Sakaya
    Kanda, Keisuke
    Negishi, Ryoju
    Muramoto, Takashi
    Hashimoto, Hirotsugu
    Morikawa, Teppei
    Matsuhashi, Nobuyuki
    Ohata, Ken
    DIGESTION, 2019, 99 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [5] The Clinical Pathological Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors- A Retrospective Analysis Based on Multi Center Data
    Gengzhou, W.
    Wei, W.
    Xingyu, F.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 105 : 75 - 75
  • [6] Clinical impact of atypical endoscopic features in rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Hyun, Jong Hee
    Lee, Seong Dae
    Youk, Eui Gon
    Lee, Jae Bum
    Lee, Enu-Jung
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (47) : 13302 - 13308
  • [7] Endoscopic treatment and management of rectal neuroendocrine tumors less than 10 mm in diameter
    Ma, Xiao-Xin
    Wang, Li-Sheng
    Wang, Luo-Lin
    Long, Ting
    Xu, Zheng-Lei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 15 (02): : 19 - 31
  • [8] Clinical Value of Clip-and-Snare Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection in Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Jiang, Xin-Tong
    Hu, Yang
    Gong, Jian
    Guo, Shi-Bin
    VISCERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 39 (05) : 140 - 146
  • [9] Endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Xin
    Xie, Haiting
    Xie, Lingduo
    Li, Jing
    Cao, Weihua
    Fu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 (02) : 259 - 268
  • [10] Clinical outcomes after endoscopic resection and the risk of lymph node metastasis in rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study
    Tie, Sheng-Jiao
    Fan, Mei-Ling
    Zhang, Jin-Yan
    Yu, Juan
    Wu, Na
    Su, Guo-Qiang
    Xu, Zhong
    Huang, Wei-Feng
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 5178 - 5186