Attainment and maintenance of platelet inhibition through standard dosing of abciximab in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:80
|
作者
Steinhubl, SR
Kottke-Marchant, K
Moliterno, DJ
Rosenthal, ML
Godfrey, NK
Coller, BS
Topol, EJ
Lincoff, AM
机构
[1] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Joseph J Jacobs Ctr Thrombosis & Vasc Biol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Clin Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Hematol, New York, NY USA
关键词
platelets; diabetes mellitus; abciximab; angioplasty;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.100.19.1977
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Although the effectiveness of abciximab (c7E3 Fab; ReoPro) in large populations of patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention has been consistently proved in clinical trials, it is unknown whether all patients achieve and maintain target inhibition during treatment. Diabetic patients in particular are a subgroup of patients with known underlying platelet abnormalities whose long-term response to abciximab has been shown to vary from that of nondiabetic patients. Methods and Results-Forty-nine diabetic and 51 nondiabetic patients who received adjunctive abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions were evaluated prospectively. The degree of platelet function inhibition was determined immediately after the abciximab bolus, 8 hours after the bolus (during the 12-hour abciximab infusion), and the next morning (13 to 26 hours after the bolus) with the use of a rapid platelet function assay (Accumetrics). After the abciximab bolus, platelet function was inhibited by 95 +/- 4% (mean +/- SD). By 8 hours, the average percent inhibition had decreased to 88 +/- 9%, with 13% of patients with <80% inhibition. The next morning (mean 19 hours after the bolus), mean inhibition was 71 +/- 14%. A difference was not found between diabetics and nondiabetics, nor was any physiological parameter found to be predictive of the response to abciximab. Conclusions-Although the majority of patients achieve and maintain greater than or equal to 80% platelet inhibition during the 12-hour infusion with standard-dose abciximab, there is substantial variability among patients. Diabetic status does not appear to influence this variability.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1982
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Abciximab in Elderly Patients with High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention An Observational Registry Study
    Iversen, Allan Z.
    Galatius, Soeren
    Pedersen, Sune
    Madsen, Jan K.
    Jensen, Jan S.
    DRUGS & AGING, 2011, 28 (05) : 369 - 378
  • [22] Aborted myocardial infarction in intracoronary compared with standard intravenous abciximab administration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Eitel, Ingo
    Desch, Steffen
    Schindler, Kathrin
    Fuernau, Georg
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 153 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [23] Cilostazol could ameliorate platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kim, Jang-Young
    Lee, Kyounghoon
    Shin, Myungsang
    Ahn, Minsoo
    Choe, Hyunmin
    Yoo, Byung-Su
    Yoon, Junghan
    Choe, Kyung-Hoon
    Lee, Seung-Hwan
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (12) : 1867 - 1872
  • [24] Early percutaneous coronary intervention, platelet inhibition with eptifibatide, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes
    Kleiman, NS
    Lincoff, AM
    Flaker, GC
    Pieper, KS
    Wilcox, RG
    Berdan, LG
    Lorenz, TJ
    Cokkinos, DV
    Simoons, ML
    Boersma, E
    Topol, EJ
    Califf, RM
    Harrington, RA
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (07) : 751 - 757
  • [25] Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention - The randomized leipzig immediate percutaneous coronary intervention abciximab IV versus IC in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial
    Thiele, Holger
    Schindler, Kathrin
    Friedenberger, Josef
    Eitel, Ingo
    Fuernau, Georg
    Grebe, Eigk
    Erbs, Sandra
    Linke, Axel
    Moebius-Winkler, Sven
    Kivelitz, Dietmar
    Schuler, Gerhard
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [27] Early abciximab administration before primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves clinical outcome in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EUROTRANSFER Registry)
    Dziewierz, Artur
    Mielecki, Waldemar
    Siudak, Zbigniew
    Rakowski, Tomasz
    Janzon, Magnus
    Birkemeyer, Ralf
    Zasada, Wojciech
    Dubiel, Jacek S.
    Dudek, Dariusz
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2012, 223 (01) : 212 - 218
  • [28] Impact of Pancreatic β-Cell Function on Clopidogrel Responsiveness and Outcomes in Chinese Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Zhao, Xiliang
    Wang, Jin
    Li, Quan
    Ye, Yicong
    Zeng, Yong
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2023, 37 (03) : 487 - 496
  • [29] Influence of dual antiplatelet therapy on mean platelet volume in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Higaki, Tadanao
    Kurisu, Satoshi
    Watanabe, Noriaki
    Ikenaga, Hiroki
    Shimonaga, Takashi
    Iwasaki, Toshitaka
    Mitsuba, Naoya
    Ishibashi, Ken
    Dohi, Yoshihiro
    Fukuda, Yukihiro
    Kihara, Yasuki
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2016, 31 (03) : 269 - 274
  • [30] Routine pretreatment with abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Subanalysis of the PRAGUE-7 study
    Rokyta, R.
    Pechman, V.
    Tousek, P.
    Pudil, R.
    Lhotska, J.
    Widimsky, P.
    EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 18 (02) : 81 - 84