Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination

被引:91
作者
Hou, Hong [1 ]
Shi, Yongjiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Dept Engn, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
关键词
VALUE CREATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS; PROCESS MODEL; CO-CREATION; STRATEGY; PLATFORMS; ARCHITECTURE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As a response to the call for cumulative knowledge in ecosystem research, this paper focuses on ecosystem literature from the perspective of a focal firm. Through an in-depth analysis of modern and classic ecosystem conceptual works, this paper clarifies the theoretical underpinnings of the structure view and the coevolution view of ecosystems. Whereas according to the structure view an ecosystem features a modular structure of multilateral interdependences, coevolutionists envisage it as a community of affiliated and interacting actors which keeps open exchange with environments. To deal with this tension, instead of proposing an integrative or overarching ecosystem definition, this research offers an integrative framework which can accommodate the merits of both views. We do so by suggesting that 1) the coevolution view helps understand where value proposition and complementarities come from and how they come about; 2) the structure view infuses granularity into the coevolution view to specify the ecosystem affiliation as a premise on which coevolution can be orchestrated; 3) affiliation plays the role as a linking concept between the two views, allowing for the focal firm's continuous innovation to be explained.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 109 条
[11]  
Baldwin C.Y, 2000, ACAD MANAG REV, V26, P471
[12]   Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms [J].
Baldwin, Carliss Y. .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2008, 17 (01) :155-195
[13]  
Bogers M., 2019, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2019, DOI 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.11080abstract
[14]   Strategic dynamics in industry architectures and the challenges of knowledge integration Introduction [J].
Brusoni, Stefan ;
Jacobides, Michael G. ;
Prencipe, Andrea .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 6 (04) :209-216
[15]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY OF STRATEGY MAKING AND ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: THEORY AND FIELD RESEARCH [J].
Burgelman, Robert A. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (03) :239-262
[16]  
Ceccagnoli M, 2016, ADV STUDY ENTREPRENE, P1
[17]   Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems [J].
Cennamo, Carmelo ;
Santalo, Juan .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (03) :617-641
[18]   Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience [J].
Chandler, Jennifer D. ;
Lusch, Robert F. .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (01) :6-22
[19]   Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange [J].
Chandler, Jennifer D. ;
Vargo, Stephen L. .
MARKETING THEORY, 2011, 11 (01) :35-49
[20]   Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age [J].
Constantinides, Panos ;
Henfridsson, Ola ;
Parker, Geoffrey G. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (02) :381-400