Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects

被引:30
作者
Taskinen, Matti [1 ]
Mantysaari, Esa A. [1 ]
Stranden, Ismo [1 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Myllytie 1, Jokioinen, Finland
关键词
GENOMIC RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; FULL PEDIGREE; US HOLSTEINS; PREDICTIONS; ANIMALS; POPULATIONS; INFORMATION; SELECTION; COMPUTE; INVERSE;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-017-0310-9
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluation combines relationship information from pedigree and genomic marker data. The inclusion of the genomic information into mixed model equations requires the inverse of the combined relationship matrix H, which has a dense matrix block for genotyped animals. Methods: To avoid inversion of dense matrices, single-step genomic BLUP can be transformed to single-step single nucleotide polymorphism BLUP (SNP-BLUP) which have observed and imputed marker coefficients. Simple block LDL type decompositions of the single-step relationship matrix H were derived to obtain different types of linearly equivalent single-step genomic mixed model equations with different sets of reparametrized random effects. For non-genotyped animals, the imputed marker coefficient terms in the single-step SNP-BLUP were calculated on-the-fly during the iterative solution using sparse matrix decompositions without storing the imputed genotypes. Residual polygenic effects were added to genotyped animals and transmitted to non-genotyped animals using relationship coefficients that are similar to imputed genotypes. The relationships were further orthogonalized to improve convergence of iterative methods. Results: All presented single-step SNP-BLUP models can be solved efficiently using iterative methods that rely on iteration on data and sparse matrix approaches. The efficiency, accuracy and iteration convergence of the derived mixed model equations were tested with a small dataset that included 73,579 animals of which 2885 were genotyped with 37,526 SNPs. Conclusions: Inversion of the large and dense genomic relationship matrix was avoided in single-step evaluation by using fully orthogonalized single-step SNP-BLUP formulations. The number of iterations until convergence was smaller in single-step SNP-BLUP formulations than in the original single-step GBLUP when heritability was low, but increased above that of the original single-step when heritability was high.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score
    Aguilar, I.
    Misztal, I.
    Johnson, D. L.
    Legarra, A.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) : 743 - 752
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1973, J ANIM SCI, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANSCI/1973.SYMPOSIUM.10
  • [3] Algorithm 887: CHOLMOD, Supernodal Sparse Cholesky Factorization and Update/Downdate
    Chen, Yanqing
    Davis, Timothy A.
    Hager, William W.
    Rajamanickam, Sivasankaran
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2008, 35 (03):
  • [4] Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Lund, Mogens S.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42
  • [5] Colleau JJ, 2002, GENET SEL EVOL, V34, P409, DOI [10.1051/gse:2002015, 10.1186/1297-9686-34-4-409]
  • [6] Eaton J., GNU OCTAVE
  • [7] A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction
    Erbe, Malena
    Gredler, Birgit
    Seefried, Franz Reinhold
    Bapst, Beat
    Simianer, Henner
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [8] A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    Dekkers, Jack C. M.
    Garrick, Dorian J.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2014, 46
  • [9] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Gao, Hongding
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Nielsen, Ulrik S.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [10] Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection
    Goddard, M. E.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2011, 128 (06) : 409 - 421