Comparison of computational intelligence based classification techniques for remotely sensed optical image classification

被引:57
作者
Stathakis, Demetris [1 ]
Vasilakos, Athanassios
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, MARS FOOD, I-21020 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Univ Thessaly, Dept Planning & Reg Dev, Volos 38334, Greece
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2006年 / 44卷 / 08期
关键词
fuzzy neural networks (FNNs); fuzzy sets; genetic algorithms (GAs); neural networks (NNs); remote sensing (RS);
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2006.872903
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Several computational intelligence components, namely neural networks (NNs), fuzzy sets, and genetic algorithms (GAs), have been applied separately or in combination to the process of remotely sensed data classification. By applying computational intelligence, we expect increased accuracy through the use of NNs, optimal NN structure and parameter determination via GAs, and transparency using fuzzy sets is expected. This paper systematically reviews and compares several configurations in the particular context of remote sensing for land cover. In addition, some of the configurations used here, such as NEFCASS and CANFIS, have few previous applications in the field. A comparison of the configurations is achieved by testing the different methods with exactly the same case-study data. A thorough assessment of results is performed by constructing an accuracy matrix for each training and testing data set. The evaluation of different methods is not only based on accuracy but also on compactness, completeness, and consistency. The architecture, produced rule set, and training parameters for the specific classification task are presented. Some comments and directions for future work are given.
引用
收藏
页码:2305 / 2318
页数:14
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Change detection using adaptive fuzzy neural networks: Environmental damage assessment after the Gulf War [J].
Abuelgasim, AA ;
Ross, WD ;
Gopal, S ;
Woodcock, CE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 70 (02) :208-223
[2]   A comparison of fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy data fusion for flooded area mapping using SAR images [J].
Amici, G ;
Dell'Acqua, F ;
Gamba, P ;
Pulina, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (20) :4425-4430
[3]   Satellite image classification using genetically guided fuzzy clustering with spatial information [J].
Bandyopadhyay, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (03) :579-593
[4]   Pixel classification using variable string genetic algorithms with chromosome differentiation [J].
Bandyopadhyay, S ;
Pal, SK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (02) :303-308
[5]   A survey of fuzzy clustering algorithms for pattern recognition - Part II [J].
Baraldi, A ;
Blonda, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 1999, 29 (06) :786-801
[6]  
Baraldi A, 1999, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V29, P778, DOI 10.1109/3477.809032
[7]   Comparison of the multilayer perceptron with neuro-fuzzy techniques in the estimation of cover class mixture in remotely sensed data [J].
Baraldi, A ;
Binaghi, E ;
Blonda, P ;
Brivio, PA ;
Rampini, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (05) :994-1005
[8]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[9]   Feature extraction for multisource data classification with artificial neural networks [J].
Benediktsson, JA ;
Sveinsson, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 18 (04) :727-740
[10]   Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing in classification of remote sensing data. [J].
Benediktsson, JA ;
Benediktsson, H .
IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING V, 1999, 3871 :176-187