Only stereo information improves performance in surgical tasks

被引:4
作者
Huber, JW [1 ]
Stringer, NS [1 ]
Davies, IRL [1 ]
Field, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Psychol, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2004年 / 5372卷
关键词
telepresence; motion parallax; stereo disparity; augmented reality; 3d; laparoscopy; surgery;
D O I
10.1117/12.544718
中图分类号
TB8 [摄影技术];
学科分类号
0804 ;
摘要
Laboratory based research has shown that the use of stereoscopic displays and observer-produced motion parallax in telepresence systems can each improve operators' performance beyond that achieved using conventional 2-D displays. In applied contexts such as minimal access surgery (MAS) tasks are more complex and a range of sources of depth information is available. We therefore decided to examine the benefits of stereoscopic displays and observer-produced motion parallax under more realistic conditions. The 'pick and place' task was taken from surgical performance studies. It involved picking up small irregular spheres from one place and dropping them through apertures in another. The task was performed under seven different viewing conditions: (1) baseline (monocular), (2) biocular, (3) stereoscopic, (4) free motion parallax, (5) instructed motion parallax, (6) augmented motion parallax and (7) stereo and motion parallax. Each subject did a baseline condition (monocular viewing) followed by one of the seven experimental conditions, followed by a final block of the baseline condition (n = 7 conditions x 10 subjects). Only stereoscopic viewing (conditions 3 and 7) leads to better performance. The provision of motion parallax adds nothing to performance. It may even reduce the effectiveness of stereoscopic viewing. The evidence converges on the fact that binocular viewing confers a considerable performance advantage, while providing motion parallax information, to novice operators at least, is not beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 470
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BARAGONA S, 2001, DOCTORS PRACTICE LAP
[2]   Comparative study of 2-D and 3-D vision systems for minimally invasive surgery [J].
Buess, GF ;
vanBergen, P ;
Kunert, W ;
Schurr, MO .
CHIRURG, 1996, 67 (10) :1041-1046
[3]   Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Chan, ACW ;
Chung, SCS ;
Yim, APC ;
Lau, JYW ;
Ng, EKW ;
Li, AKC .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (05) :438-440
[4]   Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy - Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems [J].
Dion, YM ;
Gaillard, F .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (10) :995-1000
[5]   Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance [J].
Falk, V ;
Mintz, D ;
Grünenfelder, J ;
Farm, JI ;
Burdon, TA .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (11) :1282-1288
[6]  
HABER RN, 1980, PERCEPTION PICTURES, P3
[7]   Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Hanna, GB ;
Shimi, SM ;
Cuschieri, A .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9098) :248-251
[8]  
Howard IP, 1995, Binocular Vision and Stereopsis
[9]   The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery [J].
Huber, JW ;
Taffinder, N ;
Russell, RCG ;
Darzi, A .
ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (10) :999-1016
[10]   A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy [J].
Peitgen, K ;
Walz, MV ;
Walz, MV ;
Holtmann, G ;
Eigler, FW .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (03) :262-267