Microtensile bond strength analysis of adhesive systems to Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-treated dentin

被引:30
作者
Ramos, Thaysa Monteiro [1 ]
Ramos-Oliveira, Thayanne Monteiro [1 ]
Moretto, Simone Goncalves [1 ]
de Freitas, Patricia Moreira [1 ]
Esteves-Oliveira, Marcella [2 ]
Eduardo, Carlos de Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Special Lab Lasers Dent LELO, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Operat Dent Periodontol & Prevent Dent ZPP, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dentin; Er:YAG laser; Er; Cr:YSGG laser; SEM; Microtensile bond strength; ER-YAG-LASER; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; BUR-CUT; CAVITY PREPARATION; WATER STORAGE; SURFACE; RESIN; ACID; ENAMEL; MICROLEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10103-012-1261-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments (control, diamond bur, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser) on sound dentin surface morphology and on microtensile bond strength (mu TBS). Sixteen dentin fragments were randomly divided into four groups (n = 4), and different surface treatments were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Ninety-six third molars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12) according to type of surface treatment and adhesive system: G1 = Control + Clearfil SE Bond (SE); G2 = Control + Single Bond (SB); G3 = diamond bur (DB) + SE; G4 = DB + SB, G5 = Er:YAG laser (2.94 mu m, 60 mJ, 2 Hz, 0.12 W, 19.3 J/cm(2)) + SE; G6 = Er:YAG + SB, G7 = Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2.78 mu m, 50 mJ, 30 Hz, 1.5 W, 4.5 J/cm(2)) + SE; and G8 = Er,Cr:YSGG + SB. Composite blocks were bonded to the samples, and after 24-h storage in distilled/deionized water (37 A degrees C), stick-shaped samples were obtained and submitted to mu TBS test. Bond strength values (in megapascal) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (alpha = 0.05). G1 (54.69 A +/- 7.8 MPa) showed the highest mean, which was statistically significantly higher than all the other groups (p < 0.05). For all treatments, SE showed higher bond strength than SB, except only for Er,Cr:YSGG treatment, in which the systems did not differ statistically from each other. Based on the irradiation parameters considered in this study, it can be concluded that Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation presented lower values than the control group; however, their association with self-etching adhesive does not have a significantly negative effect on sound dentin (mu TBS values of > 20 MPa).
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 573
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Bond strength of self-etching primer to bur cut, Er, Cr: YSGG, and Er: YAG lased dental surfaces [J].
Esteves-Oliveira, Marcella ;
Zezell, Denise M. ;
Apel, Christian ;
Turbino, Miriam L. ;
Correa Aranha, Ana Cecilia ;
de Paula Eduardo, Carlos ;
Gutknecht, Norbert .
PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2007, 25 (05) :373-380
[22]   Microtensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations [J].
Firat, Esra ;
Gurgan, Sevil ;
Gutknecht, Norbert .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 27 (01) :15-21
[23]   The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation:: An SEM evaluation [J].
Freitas, Patricia Moreira ;
Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo ;
Barros, Juliana Almeida ;
Eduardo, Carlos De Paula .
MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2007, 70 (09) :803-808
[24]   Tensile bond strength of ErCr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface [J].
Lee, Bor-Shiunn ;
Lin, Po-Yen ;
Chen, Min-Huey ;
Hsieh, Tseng-Ting ;
Lin, Chun-Pin ;
Lai, Juin-Yih ;
Lan, Wan-Hong .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (05) :570-578
[25]   Effects of laser and acid etching and air abrasion on mineral content of dentin [J].
Malkoc, Meral Arslan ;
Tasdemir, Serife Tuba ;
Ozturk, A. Nilgun ;
Ozturk, Bora ;
Berk, Gizem .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 26 (01) :21-27
[26]   Influence of Er:YAG laser surface treatment and primer application methods on microtensile bond strength self-etching systems [J].
Manhaes, LA ;
Oliveira, DC ;
Marques, MM ;
Matos, AB .
PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2005, 23 (03) :304-312
[27]   The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding [J].
Marshall, GW ;
Marshall, SJ ;
Kinney, JH ;
Balooch, M .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (06) :441-458
[28]   Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces [J].
Martínez-Insua, A ;
Dominguez, LD ;
Rivera, FG ;
Santana-Penín, UA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (03) :280-288
[29]  
Montes MAJR, 2005, OPER DENT, V30, P201
[30]   Effects of Ultramorphological Changes on Adhesion to Lased Dentin-Scanning Electron Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis [J].
Moretto, Simone G. ;
Azambuja, Nilton, Jr. ;
Arana-Chavez, Victor E. ;
Reis, Andre F. ;
Giannini, Marcelo ;
Eduardo, Carlos de P. ;
De Freitas, Patricia M. .
MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2011, 74 (08) :720-726