Morphometric MRI Imaging Study of the Corridor for the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique at L1-L5

被引:22
作者
Li, Jia Xi Julian [1 ,2 ]
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,2 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Morphometric; MRI; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); Spine; Surgery; MINI-OPEN; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; POSITION; OUTCOMES; SPINE; DECOMPRESSION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.136
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion are associated with approach-related disadvantages. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is the proposed solution, especially for upper lumbar levels. We analyzed the size and regional anatomy of the corridor used in the OLIF technique between levels L1 and L5. METHODS: This is a morphometric study of 200 randomly selected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies with features of lumbar degenerative disease. On MRI, the oblique corridor was defined as the smallest distance between the psoas major muscle and aorta or inferior vena cava (or common iliac artery) and measured at the L1/L2, L2/L3, L3/L4, and L4/L5 disc levels on both the left and right on the axial images at the mid-disc level. RESULTS: Mean distances of the oblique corridor on the left side were L1/L2 [18.90 mm, L2/L3 [15.50 mm; L3/L4 [12.75 mm, and L4/L5 [8.92 mm; on the right side, they were L1/L2 [14.80 mm, L2/L3 [5.50 mm, L3/L4 [3.00 mm, and L4/L5 [1.46 mm. For both sides, the corridor size was not significantly affected by sex, and it increased with age and decreased at the inferior lumbar disc levels. The L1/L2 and L2/L3 levels may be obstructed by the ipsilateral kidney and renal vasculature on both sides and the liver on the right side. CONCLUSIONS: A left-sided OLIF approach is viable for both sexes. Oblique access to the L1/L2 and L2/L3 disc levels is feasible regardless of age, whereas the L3/L4 and L4/L5 levels may be more suitable in older patients, especially for male patients. The right-sided approach is less likely to be performed effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:E678 / E685
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Cummock, Matthew D. ;
Vanni, Steven ;
Levi, Allan D. ;
Yu, Yong ;
Wang, Michael Y. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 15 (01) :11-18
[2]   Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study [J].
Davis, Timothy T. ;
Hynes, Richard A. ;
Fung, Daniel A. ;
Spann, Scott W. ;
MacMillan, Michael ;
Kwon, Brian ;
Liu, John ;
Acosta, Frank ;
Drochner, Thomas E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (05) :785-793
[3]   Lumbar Plexus Anatomy within the Psoas Muscle: Implications for the Transpsoas Lateral Approach to the L4-L5 Disc [J].
Davis, Timothy T. ;
Bae, Hyun W. ;
Mok, James M. ;
Rasouli, Alexandre ;
Delamarter, Rick B. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (16) :1482-1487
[4]   Effect of Indirect Neural Decompression Through Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease [J].
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ;
Hynes, Richard A. ;
Otsuki, Bungo ;
Kimura, Hiroaki ;
Takemoto, Mitsuru ;
Matsuda, Shuichi .
SPINE, 2015, 40 (03) :E175-E182
[5]   Systematic Review of Thigh Symptoms after Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion for Adult Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease [J].
Gammal, Isaac D. ;
Spivak, Jeffrey M. ;
Bendo, John A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
[6]   Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF) [J].
Haertl, Roger ;
Joeris, Alexander ;
McGuire, Robert A. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) :1484-1521
[7]  
Hynes RA, 2014, INT SOC ADV SPIN SUR
[8]   Cosmetic and functional outcomes following paramedian and anterolateral retroperitoneal access in anterior lumbar spine surgery [J].
Jagannathan, Jay ;
Chankaew, Ekawut ;
Urban, Peter ;
Dumont, Aaron S. ;
Sansur, Charles A. ;
Kern, John ;
Peeler, Benjamin ;
Elias, W. Jeffrey ;
Shen, Francis ;
Shaffrey, Mark E. ;
Whitehill, Richard ;
Arlet, Vincent ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (05) :454-465
[9]   Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar Interbody fusion: A retrospective review [J].
Kaiser, MG ;
Haid, RW ;
Subach, BR ;
Miller, JS ;
Smith, CD ;
Rodts, GE .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (01) :97-103
[10]   Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: Introduction and methodology [J].
Kaiser, Michael G. ;
Eck, Jason C. ;
Groff, Michael W. ;
Watters, William C., III ;
Dailey, Andrew T. ;
Resnick, Daniel K. ;
Choudhri, Tanvir F. ;
Sharan, Alok ;
Wang, Jeffrey C. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. ;
Dhall, Sanjay S. ;
Ghogawala, Zoher .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (01) :2-6