Can living labs offer a pathway to support local agri-food sustainability transitions?

被引:60
作者
Gamache, Guillaume [1 ]
Anglade, Juliette [1 ]
Feche, Romain [1 ]
Barataud, Fabienne [1 ]
Mignolet, Catherine [1 ]
Coquil, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, ASTER Mirecourt UR055, 662 Ave Louis Buffet, F-88500 Mirecourt, France
关键词
Living lab; Sustainable transition; Local agri-food system; Commons; Sustainability; Social experiment; INNOVATION; SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; SENSE; NICHE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Living labs are defined as both an approach and an arena for supporting experimentation in natural settings with a wide range of actors. In this article we explore the potential and limits of living labs for analysing and supporting the local transition of agri-food systems. We base on a bibliometric analysis and insights from our transdisciplinary research team's experience with agroecological transition. It appears that living labs informed mainly by strategic managerial and user-centric approaches benefiting the dissemination of (technological) innovation, require certain changes in order to address sustainable development issues. Citizen-centred living lab approaches are better suited to increase capacity building and empowerment through action, iterative learning, and capitalization of experience. Faced with the specific issues of local agrifood system transition, we propose to (re)-introduce the notion of "commons" in order to support the collective territorial management of both material resources (food, environment) and immaterial resources (values, ideas).
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 107
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   Governing societal transitions to sustainability [J].
Frantzeskaki, Niki ;
Loorbach, Derk ;
Meadowcroft, James .
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2012, 15 (1-2) :19-36
[32]  
Fressoli Mariano., 2015, Technology for Autonomy and Resistance: The Appropriate Technology Movement in South America
[33]   From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems - Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (6-7) :897-920
[34]  
Grin John, 2010, TRANSITION SUSTAINAB
[35]  
Habibipour, 2018, LIVING LAB RES STATE
[36]   Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics [J].
Heersmink, Richard ;
van den Hoven, Jeroen ;
van Eck, Nees Jan ;
van den Berg, Jan .
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 (03) :241-249
[37]  
Houllier F., 2016, Les sciences participatives en France
[38]   Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems' boundary dynamics [J].
Ingram, Julie .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2018, 26 :117-135
[39]   Framing niche-regime linkage as adaptation: An analysis of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe [J].
Ingram, Julie .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2015, 40 :59-75
[40]  
Jegou F., 2008, Collaborative Services. Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability