Higher Prostate Cancer Grade Groups Are Detected in Patients Undergoing Multiparametric MRI-targeted Biopsy Compared With Standard Biopsy

被引:41
作者
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, John V. [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
prostate cancer; detection; multiparametric MRI; grade groups; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; INVASION; SYSTEM; COST;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0000000000000723
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Recent studies have suggested that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided prostate biopsy can detect more clinically significant prostate cancers, which could impact patient management. As many of the studies evaluating MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy were conducted in specialized quaternary care centers, the question remains whether this technology is transferable to general practice. Our study assesses the diagnostic ability of MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy compared with standard biopsy in the new era of prostate cancer Grade Grouping. We reviewed our prostate biopsy database evaluating men who underwent MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy with concurrent standard 12-core extended-sextant biopsy. Patient demographics and pathologic findings were reviewed. All patient biopsies were performed by 1 of 2 urologic oncologists. Tumors were given a Grade Group for each biopsy based on the core with the highest grade in each case. A total of 191 patients underwent MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy with concurrent 12-core extended sextant biopsy, with a cancer detection rate of 56%. The average number of biopsy cores obtained via the targeted approach was significantly less than those obtained by standard biopsy, 4.8 cores versus 12 cores, respectively, P<0.001. There was no difference in cancer detection between targeted and standard biopsy, 41.4% and 49.2%, respectively, P=0.15. However, when comparing the 2 techniques, the degree of detection of >= Grade Group 3 tumors significantly favored targeted biopsy over standard biopsy (P=0.009). MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy is equivalent to the standard-of-care 12-core biopsy in terms of cancer detection and superior in detecting higher grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 105
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy
    Baco, Eduard
    Rud, Erik
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Moen, Gunnar
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Svindland, Aud
    Eggesbo, Heidi B.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 149 - 156
  • [2] COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE-FREE SURVIVAL BETWEEN PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 3 AND PRIMARY GLEASON SCORE 4 FOR BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCER
    Burdick, Michael J.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ulchaker, James
    Angermeier, Kenneth
    Altman, Andrew
    Chehade, Nabil
    Mahadevan, Arul
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (05): : 1439 - 1445
  • [3] Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy
    Chan, TY
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) : 823 - 827
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and MR-guided Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: A Modelling Study from a Health Care Perspective
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Crienen, Simone
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    Grutters, Janneke P. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) : 430 - 436
  • [5] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [6] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [7] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [8] PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING
    GLEASON, DF
    MELLINGE.GT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [9] Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    Epstein, Jonathan
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [10] Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer Is More Frequently Detected by Multiparametric MRI Targeted Biopsy Compared With Standard Biopsy
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) : 490 - 494