Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India

被引:33
|
作者
Shuai, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Yujia [1 ]
Wang, Yilan [1 ]
Cheng, Jinhua [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy products; International competitiveness; Projection pursuit; TOPSIS; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; WIND POWER; SOLAR PV; POLICY; BELT; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COUNTRIES; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.123614
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In order to achieve the goal of limiting the global average temperature increase by 2 degrees C in the Paris Agreement on climate change, the international community must make unprecedented changes to the current human lifestyle, energy and transportation system. Under such circumstances, the United States, China, India and other developing and developed countries have made remarkable progress in renewable energy production and trade. In order to systematically evaluate the international competitiveness of renewable energy products of the United States, China and India, the current study has built a new multi-dimensional evaluation index to estimate the international competitive edge of renewable energy products exported from these countries, by abandoning the traditional methods for measuring trade competitiveness and adopting the projection pursuit (PP), TOPSIS model and the improved weighting methodology. The results demonstrate that the overall international competitiveness of renewable energy products of the United States is very strong, whereas China and India have seen a rapid growth; and distinct differences exist in the component factors leading to the international competitiveness among the three countries. Based on these findings, this study has put forward corresponding policy implications. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States
    Handley, Kyle
    Limao, Nuno
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (09) : 2731 - 2783
  • [42] Trends in Pharmaceutical Scholarly Communications from India, China and United States: A Comparative Study
    Das, Priyambada
    Ramesh, D. B.
    DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 39 (05): : 230 - 237
  • [43] Impact of Population Aging and Renewable Energy Consumption on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in Rural China: Evidence from Panel VAR Approach
    Li, Houjian
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Tang, Mengqian
    Guo, Lili
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [44] Role of policy in deployment of wind energy: evidence across states of India
    Panse, Riddhi
    Kathuria, Vinish
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 53 : 422 - 432
  • [45] The impact of green finance on renewable energy development efficiency in the context of energy security: Evidence from China
    Zhou, Fangkezi
    Pan, Yinghao
    Wu, Jie
    Xu, Chengzhen
    Li, Xingchen
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 82 : 803 - 816
  • [46] What cause regional inequality of technology innovation in renewable energy? Evidence from China
    Zhao, Ge
    Zhou, P.
    Wen, Wen
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 310
  • [47] Does legislation promote technological innovation in renewable energy enterprises? Evidence from China
    Cao, Hongjian
    Zhao, Yu
    Yuan, Li
    Li, Ke
    ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 188
  • [48] THE SIMULTANEOUS IMPACT OF URBANIZATION AND EDUCATION ON RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Jia, Lijun
    Zhang, Hanyue
    Xu, Ruoyu
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 21 (3C): : 531 - 548
  • [49] Green finance, renewable energy development, and climate change: evidence from regions of China
    Sun, Yunpeng
    Bao, Qun
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [50] Impact of Green Finance on Renewable Energy Technology Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China
    Shi, Xiaoyan
    Shi, Daimin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)