Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Mineralized Collagen in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Kui [1 ]
Teng, Yu [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jieng [1 ]
Guo, Huizi [4 ]
Antezana, Juan Pablo Escalera [3 ]
Cui, Fuzhai [5 ]
He, Xiaobin [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, People Hosp Jingzhou 1, Dept Orthopaed, Jinzhou 434000, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[4] Havergal Coll, Toronto, ON M5N 2H9, Canada
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nanocomposite; PLIF; Bone Graft; Mineralized Collagen; Nano Hydroxyapatite; ILIAC CREST; BMP-2-RELATED PEPTIDE; BONE-MARROW; RHBMP-2; MATRIX; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; COMPLICATIONS; COMPOSITES; SCAFFOLD; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1166/jbt.2014.1172
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Nanocomposites and nanostructured materials are believed to play a key role in orthopaedic research, as the bone itself being a typical example of a nanocomposite. The mineralized collagen (MC) was developed by biomimetic synthesis wherein nano hydroxyapatite and mineralized collagen assembled fibres, mimics natural bone, both composition and microstructure somewhat. In this retrospective, non-randomized matched clinical, blocks of MC as a bone graft substitute combined with the local bone and autogenously iliac crest were implanted separately in 28 pairs of patients who underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one level (PLIF). Mean operative time and mean blood loss in the group Bone MC/local were significantly lower than the group of iliac crest bone graft. After 2 years, the X-rays and CT scans revealed that the fusion result was evident in 92% of patients in the bone MC/local, compared with 94% in the autogenous iliac crest. During the final follow-up time, the Oswestry Disability Index scores, the average scores for back and leg pain showed significant improvement compared with the preoperative scores in both groups, however, a large number of patients in the graft in iliac crest presented with persistent pain at the donor site. In the posterior lumbar interbody fusion using MC bone mixed with the local bone as extender, it reduces operating time and blood loss, the rates of fusion yields were satisfactory compared to autogenous iliac crest and avoided the problem of morbidity regarding donor site harvesting iliac bone.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 294
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches
    Cole C.D.
    McCall T.D.
    Schmidt M.H.
    Dailey A.T.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2 (2) : 118 - 126
  • [42] Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Clinical and Radiological Results
    Lee, Young Seok
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    Chung, Chan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 56 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [43] Effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the lumbar sagittal spinal profile
    Diedrich, O
    Lüring, C
    Pennekamp, PH
    Perlick, L
    Wallny, T
    Kraft, CN
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2003, 141 (04): : 425 - 432
  • [44] Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar degenerative disease
    Wu, Yungang
    Tang, Hao
    Li, Zhonghai
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Shi, Zhicai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (06) : 780 - 783
  • [45] Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of three surgical approaches
    Liu, Guanyi
    Wang, Xuan
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Xu, Nanjian
    Mao, Lu
    Qian, Jun
    Liao, Xuyu
    Zhou, Leijie
    Niu, Yadan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 34 (01) : 204 - 214
  • [46] Patient-Based Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis
    Okuda, Shinya
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Oda, Takenori
    Yamasaki, Ryoji
    Maeno, Takafumi
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Matsumoto, Tomiya
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (03) : E148 - E154
  • [47] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients
    Kim, Choll W.
    Doerr, Todd M.
    Luna, Ingrid Y.
    Joshua, Gita
    Shen, Sun Ren
    Fu, Xin
    Wu, Ai-Min
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 90 : 228 - 235
  • [48] The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (03) : 205 - 212
  • [49] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [50] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION USING THE RAY THREADED FUSION CAGE
    LECLERCQ, TA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 2 (02) : 129 - 131