Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Mineralized Collagen in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Kui [1 ]
Teng, Yu [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jieng [1 ]
Guo, Huizi [4 ]
Antezana, Juan Pablo Escalera [3 ]
Cui, Fuzhai [5 ]
He, Xiaobin [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, People Hosp Jingzhou 1, Dept Orthopaed, Jinzhou 434000, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[4] Havergal Coll, Toronto, ON M5N 2H9, Canada
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nanocomposite; PLIF; Bone Graft; Mineralized Collagen; Nano Hydroxyapatite; ILIAC CREST; BMP-2-RELATED PEPTIDE; BONE-MARROW; RHBMP-2; MATRIX; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; COMPLICATIONS; COMPOSITES; SCAFFOLD; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1166/jbt.2014.1172
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Nanocomposites and nanostructured materials are believed to play a key role in orthopaedic research, as the bone itself being a typical example of a nanocomposite. The mineralized collagen (MC) was developed by biomimetic synthesis wherein nano hydroxyapatite and mineralized collagen assembled fibres, mimics natural bone, both composition and microstructure somewhat. In this retrospective, non-randomized matched clinical, blocks of MC as a bone graft substitute combined with the local bone and autogenously iliac crest were implanted separately in 28 pairs of patients who underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion at one level (PLIF). Mean operative time and mean blood loss in the group Bone MC/local were significantly lower than the group of iliac crest bone graft. After 2 years, the X-rays and CT scans revealed that the fusion result was evident in 92% of patients in the bone MC/local, compared with 94% in the autogenous iliac crest. During the final follow-up time, the Oswestry Disability Index scores, the average scores for back and leg pain showed significant improvement compared with the preoperative scores in both groups, however, a large number of patients in the graft in iliac crest presented with persistent pain at the donor site. In the posterior lumbar interbody fusion using MC bone mixed with the local bone as extender, it reduces operating time and blood loss, the rates of fusion yields were satisfactory compared to autogenous iliac crest and avoided the problem of morbidity regarding donor site harvesting iliac bone.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 294
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pairuchvej, Saran
    Muljadi, Janisa Andrea
    Arirachakaran, Alisara
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 583 - 593
  • [32] Hydroxyapatite/collagen composite graft for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison with local bone graft
    Yoshii, Toshitaka
    Hashimoto, Motonori
    Egawa, Satoru
    Hirai, Takashi
    Inose, Hiroyuki
    Okawa, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [33] Long-term Durability of Minimal Invasive Posterior Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up
    Rouben, David
    Casnellie, Michael
    Ferguson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (05): : 288 - 296
  • [34] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Fan, Guoxin
    Wu, Xinbo
    Yu, Shunzhi
    Sun, Qi
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    He, Shisheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [35] Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Satake, Kotaro
    Ito, Kenyu
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Ouchida, Jun
    Segi, Naoki
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Ando, Kei
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    Imagama, Shiro
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (18) : E1172 - E1178
  • [36] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as an Adjunct to Posterior Instrumented Correction of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Crandall, Dennis G.
    Revella, Jan
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) : 2126 - 2133
  • [37] Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model
    Shih-Tien Wang
    Vijay K. Goel
    Chong-Yau Fu
    Shinichiro Kubo
    Woosung Choi
    Chien-Lin Liu
    Tain-Hsiung Chen
    International Orthopaedics, 2006, 30 : 299 - 304
  • [38] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients
    Potter, BK
    Freedman, BA
    Verwiebe, EG
    Hall, JM
    Polly, DW
    Kuklo, TR
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (04): : 337 - 346
  • [39] Revisiting the Role of Uninstrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Coutinho, Pedro O.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 115 : 503 - 505
  • [40] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
    Katz, Austen D.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Greenwood, Matthew
    Cote, Mark
    Moss, Isaac L.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08): : E386 - E396