Transvenous revision of leads with cardiac perforation following device implantation-Safety, outcome, and complications

被引:6
作者
Doering, Michael [1 ]
Muessigbrodt, Andreas [1 ]
Ebert, Micaela [1 ]
Bode, Kerstin [1 ]
Lucas, Johannes [1 ]
Dagres, Nikolaos [1 ]
Hindricks, Gerhard [1 ]
Richter, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr, Dept Electrophysiol, Strumpellstr 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2020年 / 43卷 / 11期
关键词
cardiac perforation; defibrillator lead; pacemaker lead; transvenous lead extraction; EXPERT CONSENSUS STATEMENT; DEFIBRILLATOR LEAD; ESC GUIDELINES; VENTRICULAR PERFORATION; PERMANENT PACEMAKER; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; HEART; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Cardiac perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Transvenous revision of perforated leads is associated with the risk of cardiac tamponade and death. Little is known about periprocedural complications and outcome of these patients. Methods and results All patients referred to our department with evidence or suspicion of cardiac perforation following CIED implantation underwent chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, device interrogation, and, if necessary, a cardiac computed tomography (CT)-scan to diagnose lead perforation and associated complications. Transvenous lead revision (TLR) was performed in all patients with evidence of lead perforation. Patient characteristics, procedural complications, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-six patients (75 +/- 10 years, 43% male) were diagnosed with cardiac perforation, 34 patients (61%) early within 30 days post-implantation, and 22 patients (39%) thereafter. The most frequent perforation site was the right ventricular (RV) apex (75%), followed by the RV free wall (16%) and the right atrial appendage (9%). A total of 16 patients (29%) presented with severe complications; 12 patients (21%) with pericardial effusion treated by pericardiocentesis before lead revision and four patients (7%) with hematothorax requiring drainage. Late perforations showed significantly more frequent cardiac tamponades (P = .041). TLR was performed without further complications in 54 patients (96%). None of the patients required surgical treatment or experienced in-hospital death. Conclusions Cardiac perforation following CIED implantation is associated with severe complications in nearly one-third of the cases. Transvenous revision of the perforated lead can safely be performed with a very low complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1332
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Long-Term Outcome of Leads and Patients Following Robotic Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kamath, Ganesh S.
    Balaram, Sandhya
    Choi, Andrew
    Kuteyeva, Olga
    Garikipati, Naga Vamsi
    Steinberg, Jonathan S.
    Mittal, Suneet
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (02): : 235 - 240
  • [42] Safety and In-Hospital Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Device-Related Infections Analysis of 13 Years of Inpatient Data in the United States
    Hosseini, Seyed Mohammadreza
    Rozen, Guy
    Kaadan, M. Ihsan
    Galvin, Jennifer
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (12) : 1450 - 1458
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular and pectoralis nerve blocks as primary peri-procedural analgesia for cardiac electronic device implantation: A pilot study
    Antiperovitch, Pavel
    Mokhtar, Ahmed T.
    Yee, Raymond
    Manlucu, Jaimie
    Gula, Lorne J.
    Leong-Sit, Peter
    Skanes, Allan C.
    Tang, Anthony S. L.
    Khan, Habib Rehman
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (12): : 1447 - 1454
  • [44] Major cardiac and vascular complications after transvenous lead extraction: acute outcome and predictive factors fromthe ESC-EHRA ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled) registry
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Segreti, Luca
    Laroche, Cecile
    Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina
    Kutarski, Andrzej
    Regoli, Francois
    Butter, Christian
    Defaye, Pascal
    Pasquie, Jean Luc
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Maggioni, Aldo P.
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (05): : 771 - 780
  • [45] Validating administrative data to identify complex surgical site infections following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a comparison of traditional methods and machine learning
    Rennert-May, Elissa
    Leal, Jenine
    MacDonald, Matthew K.
    Cannon, Kristine
    Smith, Stephanie
    Exner, Derek
    Larios, Oscar E.
    Bush, Kathryn
    Chew, Derek
    ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [46] Canadian Cardiovascular Society Focused Position Statement Update on Assessment of the Cardiac Patient for Fitness to Drive: Fitness Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Baskett, Roger
    Crowell, Richard
    Freed, Darren
    Giannetti, Nadia
    Simpson, Christopher S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (02) : 137 - 140
  • [47] Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade
    Haghjoo, Majid
    Nikoo, Mohammad Hossein
    Fazelifar, Amir Farjam
    Alizadeh, Abolfath
    Emkanjoo, Zahra
    Sadr-Ameli, Mohammad Ali
    EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (05): : 328 - 332
  • [48] Impact of Cardiac Risk Factors on Complications Following Cranial Vault Remodeling: Analysis of the 2012 to 2016 National Safety Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Database
    Bartz-Kurycki, Marisa
    Wei, Shuyan
    Bernardi, Karla
    Moffitt, Joseph K.
    Greives, Matthew R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (02) : 442 - 447