Transvenous revision of leads with cardiac perforation following device implantation-Safety, outcome, and complications

被引:6
|
作者
Doering, Michael [1 ]
Muessigbrodt, Andreas [1 ]
Ebert, Micaela [1 ]
Bode, Kerstin [1 ]
Lucas, Johannes [1 ]
Dagres, Nikolaos [1 ]
Hindricks, Gerhard [1 ]
Richter, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr, Dept Electrophysiol, Strumpellstr 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2020年 / 43卷 / 11期
关键词
cardiac perforation; defibrillator lead; pacemaker lead; transvenous lead extraction; EXPERT CONSENSUS STATEMENT; DEFIBRILLATOR LEAD; ESC GUIDELINES; VENTRICULAR PERFORATION; PERMANENT PACEMAKER; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; HEART; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Cardiac perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Transvenous revision of perforated leads is associated with the risk of cardiac tamponade and death. Little is known about periprocedural complications and outcome of these patients. Methods and results All patients referred to our department with evidence or suspicion of cardiac perforation following CIED implantation underwent chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, device interrogation, and, if necessary, a cardiac computed tomography (CT)-scan to diagnose lead perforation and associated complications. Transvenous lead revision (TLR) was performed in all patients with evidence of lead perforation. Patient characteristics, procedural complications, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-six patients (75 +/- 10 years, 43% male) were diagnosed with cardiac perforation, 34 patients (61%) early within 30 days post-implantation, and 22 patients (39%) thereafter. The most frequent perforation site was the right ventricular (RV) apex (75%), followed by the RV free wall (16%) and the right atrial appendage (9%). A total of 16 patients (29%) presented with severe complications; 12 patients (21%) with pericardial effusion treated by pericardiocentesis before lead revision and four patients (7%) with hematothorax requiring drainage. Late perforations showed significantly more frequent cardiac tamponades (P = .041). TLR was performed without further complications in 54 patients (96%). None of the patients required surgical treatment or experienced in-hospital death. Conclusions Cardiac perforation following CIED implantation is associated with severe complications in nearly one-third of the cases. Transvenous revision of the perforated lead can safely be performed with a very low complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1332
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] High recurrence of device-related adverse events following transvenous lead extraction procedure in patients with cardiac resynchronization devices
    Regoli, Francois
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Rordorf, Roberto
    Santamaria, Matteo
    Klersy, Caterine
    Segreti, Luca
    De Regibus, Valentina
    Moccetti, Tiziano
    Conte, Giulio
    Caputo, Maria Luce
    Auricchio, Angelo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1270 - 1277
  • [32] Effect of a Novel Pocket Compression Device on Hematomas Following Cardiac Electronic Device Implantation in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants
    Fei, Ye-Ping
    Wang, Lei
    Zhu, Chun-Yan
    Sun, Jing-Chao
    Hu, Hui-Lin
    Zhai, Chang-Lin
    He, Chao-Jie
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [33] Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a cardiac implantable electronic device implantation following a recent non-device-related infection
    Chen, H-C
    Chen, Y-L
    Lee, W-C
    Tsai, T-H
    Pan, K-L
    Lin, Y-S
    Chen, M-C
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2020, 105 (02) : 272 - 279
  • [34] Sex differences in CRT device implantation rates, efficacy, and complications following implantation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Dewidar, Omar
    Birnie, David
    Podinic, Irina
    Welch, Vivian
    Wells, George A.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [35] Outcome of video-assisted thoracoscopic implantation of epicardial left ventricular leads with visual targeting for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Stauber, Annina
    Tanner, Hildegard
    Noti, Fabian
    Roten, Laurent
    Seiler, Jens
    Lam, Anna
    Medeiros-Domingo, Argelia
    Servatius, Helge
    Van Nam Tran
    Carrel, Thierry
    Weber, Alberto
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [36] Inpatient vs. elective outpatient cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation and long-term clinical outcome
    Ajijola, Olujimi A.
    Macklin, Eric A.
    Moore, Stephanie A.
    McCarty, David
    Bischoff, Kara E.
    Heist, Edwin Kevin
    Picard, Michael
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Dec, George William
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    EUROPACE, 2010, 12 (12): : 1745 - 1749
  • [37] Prognostic impact of newly detected atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
    Hayashi, Hiroshi
    Iwasaki, Yu-Ki
    Arai, Toshiki
    Mimuro, Rei
    Hachisuka, Masato
    Maru, Yujin
    Fujimoto, Yuhi
    Oka, Eiichiro
    Hagiwara, Kanako
    Imori, Yoichi
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    Murata, Hiroshige
    Yodogawa, Kenji
    Takano, Hitoshi
    Shimizu, Wataru
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2021, 36 (05) : 667 - 674
  • [38] Post-operative pain following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: insights from the BRUISE CONTROL trials
    Nair, Girish M.
    Birnie, David H.
    Sumner, Glen L.
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    Healey, Jeffrey S.
    Nery, Pablo B.
    Kalfon, Eli
    Verma, Atul
    Ayala-Paredes, Felix
    Coutu, Benoit
    Becker, Giuliano
    Philippon, Francois
    Eikelboom, John
    Sandhu, Roopinder K.
    Sapp, John
    Leather, Richard
    Yung, Derek
    Thibault, Bernard
    Simpson, Christopher S.
    Ahmad, Kamran
    Sturmer, Marcio
    Kavanagh, Katherine
    Crystal, Eugene
    Wells, George A.
    Essebag, Vidal
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 (05): : 748 - 756
  • [39] Rate, causes, and impact on patient outcome of implantable device complications requiring surgical revision: large population survey from two centres in Italy
    Palmisano, Pietro
    Accogli, Michele
    Zaccaria, Maria
    Luzzi, Giovanni
    Nacci, Frida
    Anaclerio, Matteo
    Favale, Stefano
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (04): : 531 - 539
  • [40] Impact of major non-cardiac complications on outcome following cardiac surgery procedures: logistic regression analysis in a very recent patient cohort†
    Rahmanian, Parwis B.
    Kroener, Axel
    Langebartels, Georg
    Oezel, Orhan
    Wippermann, Jens
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 17 (02) : 319 - 326