Transvenous revision of leads with cardiac perforation following device implantation-Safety, outcome, and complications

被引:6
|
作者
Doering, Michael [1 ]
Muessigbrodt, Andreas [1 ]
Ebert, Micaela [1 ]
Bode, Kerstin [1 ]
Lucas, Johannes [1 ]
Dagres, Nikolaos [1 ]
Hindricks, Gerhard [1 ]
Richter, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr, Dept Electrophysiol, Strumpellstr 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2020年 / 43卷 / 11期
关键词
cardiac perforation; defibrillator lead; pacemaker lead; transvenous lead extraction; EXPERT CONSENSUS STATEMENT; DEFIBRILLATOR LEAD; ESC GUIDELINES; VENTRICULAR PERFORATION; PERMANENT PACEMAKER; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; HEART; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14056
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Cardiac perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Transvenous revision of perforated leads is associated with the risk of cardiac tamponade and death. Little is known about periprocedural complications and outcome of these patients. Methods and results All patients referred to our department with evidence or suspicion of cardiac perforation following CIED implantation underwent chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, device interrogation, and, if necessary, a cardiac computed tomography (CT)-scan to diagnose lead perforation and associated complications. Transvenous lead revision (TLR) was performed in all patients with evidence of lead perforation. Patient characteristics, procedural complications, and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-six patients (75 +/- 10 years, 43% male) were diagnosed with cardiac perforation, 34 patients (61%) early within 30 days post-implantation, and 22 patients (39%) thereafter. The most frequent perforation site was the right ventricular (RV) apex (75%), followed by the RV free wall (16%) and the right atrial appendage (9%). A total of 16 patients (29%) presented with severe complications; 12 patients (21%) with pericardial effusion treated by pericardiocentesis before lead revision and four patients (7%) with hematothorax requiring drainage. Late perforations showed significantly more frequent cardiac tamponades (P = .041). TLR was performed without further complications in 54 patients (96%). None of the patients required surgical treatment or experienced in-hospital death. Conclusions Cardiac perforation following CIED implantation is associated with severe complications in nearly one-third of the cases. Transvenous revision of the perforated lead can safely be performed with a very low complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1332
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] Risk Factors Influencing Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: Infection, Pneumothorax and Heart Perforation A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
    Lin, Yu-Sheng
    Hung, Sheng-Ping
    Chen, Pei-Rung
    Yang, Chia-Hung
    Wo, Hung-Ta
    Chang, Po-Cheng
    Wang, Chun-Chieh
    Chou, Chung-Chuan
    Wen, Ming-Shien
    Chung, Chang-Ming
    Chen, Tien-Hsing
    MEDICINE, 2014, 93 (27)
  • [22] A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation After Transvenous Lead Removal of Infected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
    Tan, Min Choon
    Tan, Jian Liang
    Tay, Soon Tzeh
    Sorajja, Dan
    Scott, Luis
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Russo, Andrea M.
    Hussein, Ayman
    Lee, Justin Z.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 203 : 444 - 450
  • [23] Prospective Study of Tricuspid Regurgitation Associated With Permanent Leads After Cardiac Rhythm Device Implantation
    Van De Heyning, Caroline M.
    Elbarasi, Esam
    Masiero, Simona
    Brambatti, Michela
    Ghazal, Sami
    Al-Maashani, Said
    Capucci, Alessandro
    Leong, Darryl
    Shivalkar, Bharati
    Saenen, Johan B.
    Miljoen, Hielko P.
    Morillo, Carlos A.
    Divarakarmenon, Syamkumar
    Amit, Guy
    Ribas, Sebastian
    Baiocco, Erika
    Maolo, Alessandro
    Romandini, Andrea
    Maffei, Simone
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    Dokainish, Hisham
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 389 - 395
  • [24] Rate and impact on patient outcome and healthcare utilization of complications requiring surgical revision: Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy
    Palmisano, Pietro
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Ammendola, Ernesto
    D'Onofrio, Antonio
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Laffi, Mattia
    Biffi, Mauro
    Nigro, Gerardo
    Bianchi, Walter
    Prenna, Eleonora
    Angeletti, Andrea
    Guido, Alessandro
    Stronati, Giulia
    Gaggioli, Germano
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Accogli, Michele
    Guerra, Federico
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (06) : 1712 - 1723
  • [25] Incidence and predictors of clinically relevant cardiac perforation associated with systematic implantation of active-fixation pacing and defibrillation leads: a single-centre experience with over 3800 implanted leads
    Cano, Oscar
    Andres, Ana
    Alonso, Pau
    Osca, Joaquin
    Sancho-Tello, Maria-Jose
    Olague, Jose
    Martinez-Dolz, Luis
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (01): : 96 - 102
  • [26] The effectiveness and safety of temporary transvenous cardiac pacing leads placement into coronary sinus vein in patients with sick sinus syndrome
    Chen, Mingxian
    Wu, Zhihong
    Hu, Lin
    Li, Xuping
    Yang, Hui
    Liu, Zhenjiang
    Xiao, Yichao
    Liu, Qiming
    Zhou, Shenghua
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [27] Check the Need-Prevalence and Outcome after Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electric Device Extraction without Reimplantation
    D'Angelo, Giuseppe
    Zweiker, David
    Fierro, Nicolai
    Marzi, Alessandra
    Paglino, Gabriele
    Gulletta, Simone
    Matta, Mario
    Melillo, Francesco
    Bisceglia, Caterina
    Limite, Luca Rosario
    Cireddu, Manuela
    Vergara, Pasquale
    Bosica, Francesco
    Falasconi, Giulio
    Pannone, Luigi
    Brugliera, Luigia
    Oloriz, Teresa
    Sala, Simone
    Radinovic, Andrea
    Baratto, Francesca
    Malatino, Lorenzo
    Peretto, Giovanni
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Spartalis, Michael D.
    Frontera, Antonio
    Della Bella, Paolo
    Mazzone, Patrizio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [28] Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: A GALLERY subgroup analysis
    Chung, Da-Un
    Burger, Heiko
    Kaiser, Lukas
    Osswald, Brigitte
    Baersh, Volker
    Naegele, Herbert
    Knaut, Michael
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Gessler, Nele
    Willems, Stephan
    Butter, Christian
    Pecha, Simon
    Hakmi, Samer
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (02) : 181 - 189
  • [29] Lead complications, device infections, and clinical outcomes in the first year after implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker
    Schuchert, Andreas
    Muto, Carmine
    Maounis, Themistoklis
    Frank, Robert
    Boulogne, Eric
    Polauck, Alexander
    Padeletti, Luigi
    EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (01): : 71 - 76
  • [30] Double left ventricular pacing following accidental malpositioning of the right ventricular electrode during implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device
    Dissmann, Ruediger
    Wolthoff, Udo
    Zabel, Markus
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 8