Quality of life for men receiving a second treatment for prostate cancer

被引:8
作者
Arredondo, Shelley A.
Latini, David M.
Sadetsky, Natalia
Kawakami, Jun
Pasta, David J.
DuChane, Janeen
Carroll, Peter R.
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care & Utilizat Studies, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Urol & Oncol, Kingston Gen Hosp, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] TAP Pharmaceut Prod Inc, Lake Forest, IL USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, Program Urol Oncol, Ctr Comprehens Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, Program Genitourinary Canc Epidemiol, Ctr Comprehens Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, Program Populat Sci, Ctr Comprehens Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Baylor Coll Med, Dan L Duncan Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
quality of life; prostatic neoplasms; outcome assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed the impact of second treatment on health related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. This issue is important because second treatment resulting from prostate specific antigen recurrence has the potential to further negatively impact. health related quality of life and affect the overall value of treatment. We compared differences in health related quality of life before and after second treatment for men who had asymptomatic prostate specific antigen recurrence with those who did not. have biochemical failure. Materials and Methods: Men in this analysis (897) had localized disease, initially underwent radical prostatectomy monotherapy, and completed at least 1 health related quality of life questionnaire before and after radical prostatectomy. In this cohort. 175 men underwent second treatment (nonadjuvant). The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index were used to measure health related quality of life. Associations between patient groups and time on health related quality of life were analyzed using repeated measures. Results: Men who received a second treatment presented with more severe disease before radical prostatectomy and had worse general health related quality of life. Although health related quality of life differed significantly with time for the 2 groups, most domains for the second treatment group improved or remained stable until 15 months before second treatment, at which point they declined. Scores in the sexual functioning and role-physical domains showed clinically and statistically significant patterns of decreasing with time. Conclusions: Health related quality of life is affected following second treatment but starts to decline approximately 1 year before second treatment. Not all aspects of health related quality of life decreased at the same rate, so patients should be counseled that. certain domains may be affected more by additional treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Patterns of practice in the United States: Insights from CaPSURE on prostate cancer management [J].
Cooperberg M.R. ;
Broering J.M. ;
Latini D.M. ;
Litwin M.S. ;
Wallace K.L. ;
Carroll P.R. .
Current Urology Reports, 2004, 5 (3) :166-172
[2]   The impact of androgen deprivation on quality of life after radical prostatectomy for prostate carcinoma [J].
Fowler, FJ ;
Collins, MM ;
Corkery, EW ;
Elliott, DB ;
Barry, MJ .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (02) :287-295
[3]   Androgen deprivation therapy for patients with clinically localized (stages T1 to T3) prostate cancer and for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Small, EJ ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Latini, D ;
Broering, JM ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (2A) :56-64
[4]   The effect of post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy on quality of life: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Hu, JC ;
Elkin, EP ;
Litwin, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04) :56-56
[5]   Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Hu, JC ;
Elkin, EP ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Kattan, MW ;
Carroll, PR ;
Litwin, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :703-707
[6]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[7]   The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index - Development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Hays, RD ;
Fink, A ;
Ganz, PA ;
Leake, B ;
Brook, RH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (07) :1002-1012
[8]   Quality of life following definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer: potential impact of multiple therapies [J].
Litwin, MS .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) :153-156
[9]   Changes in health-related quality of life in the first year after treatment for prostate cancer: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Lubeck, DP ;
Litwin, MS ;
Henning, JM ;
Stoddard, ML ;
Flanders, SC ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (01) :180-186
[10]   The CaPSURE database: A methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer [J].
Lubeck, DP ;
Litwin, MS ;
Henning, JM ;
Stier, DM ;
Mazonson, P ;
Fisk, R ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (05) :773-777