The near-coastal microseism spectrum: Spatial and temporal wave climate relationships

被引:169
作者
Bromirski, PD
Duennebier, FK
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Integrat Oceanog Div, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Dept Geol & Geophys, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
microseisms; wave climate; microseism source areas; Rayleigh wave attenuation; microseism propagation characteristics; ocean bottom seismometer;
D O I
10.1029/2001JB000265
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
[1] Comparison of the ambient noise data recorded at near-coastal ocean bottom and inland seismic stations at the Oregon coast with both offshore and nearshore buoy data shows that the near-coastal microseism spectrum results primarily from nearshore gravity wave activity. Low double-frequency (DF), microseism energy is observed at near-coastal locations when seas nearby are calm, even when very energetic seas are present at buoys 500 km offshore. At wave periods >8 s, shore reflection is the dominant source of opposing wave components for near-coastal DF microseism generation, with the variation of DF microseism levels poorly correlated with local wind speed. Near-coastal ocean bottom DF levels are consistently similar to20 dB higher than nearby DF levels on land, suggesting that Rayleigh/Stoneley waves with much of the mode energy propagating in the water column dominate the near-coastal ocean bottom microseism spectrum. Monitoring the southward propagation of swell from an extreme storm concentrated at the Oregon coast shows that near-coastal DF microseism levels are dominated by wave activity at the shoreline closest to the seismic station. Microseism attenuation estimates between on-land near-coastal stations and seismic stations similar to150 km inland indicate a zone of higher attenuation along the California coast between San Francisco and the Oregon border.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   PARTICLE MOTION AND PRESSURE RELATIONSHIPS OF OCEAN BOTTOM NOISE - 3900 M DEPTH - 0.003 TO 5 HZ [J].
BARSTOW, N ;
SUTTON, GH ;
CARTER, JA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1989, 16 (10) :1185-1188
[2]  
BOUWS E, 1983, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V13, P1653, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<1653:OTBBGA>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
BRETSCHNEIDER CL, 1959, 118 BEACH ER BOARD
[5]   Ocean wave height determined from inland seismometer data: Implications for investigating wave climate changes in the NE Pacific [J].
Bromirski, PD ;
Flick, RE ;
Graham, N .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1999, 104 (C9) :20753-20766
[6]  
BROMIRSKI PD, 1995, 9503 SOEST U HAW
[7]  
CESSARO RK, 1994, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V84, P142
[8]   CARTESIAN DIVER OBSERVATIONS OF DOUBLE FREQUENCY PRESSURE-FLUCTUATIONS IN THE UPPER LEVELS OF THE OCEAN [J].
COX, CS ;
JACOBS, DC .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1989, 16 (08) :807-810
[9]   SEA-FLOOR COMPLIANCE OBSERVED BY LONG-PERIOD PRESSURE AND DISPLACEMENT MEASUREMENTS [J].
CRAWFORD, WC ;
WEBB, SC ;
HILDEBRAND, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1991, 96 (B10) :16151-16160
[10]  
DORMAN LM, 1991, SHEAR WAVES IN MARINE SEDIMENTS, P239