Adaptive group sequential design for phase II clinical trials: A Bayesian decision theoretic approach

被引:9
作者
Chen, Yiyi [1 ]
Smith, Brian J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
关键词
adaptive design; Bayesian; decision theory; phase II clinical trials; safety and efficacy monitoring; SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION; TOXICITY; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/sim.3711
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Bayesian decision theoretic approaches (BDTAs) have been widely studied in the literature as tools for designing and conducting phase 11 clinical trials. However, full Bayesian approaches that consider multiple endpoints are lacking. Since the monitoring of toxicity is a major goal of phase 11 trials, we propose an adaptive group sequential design using a BDTA, which characterizes efficacy and toxicity as correlated bivariate binary endpoints. We allow trade-off between the two endpoints. Interim evaluations are conducted group sequentially, but the number of interim looks and the size of each group are chosen adaptively based on current observations. We utilize a loss function consisting of two components: the loss associated with accruing, treating, and monitoring patients, and the loss associated with making incorrect decisions. The performance of our Bayesian modeling, and the operating characteristics of decision rules under a wide range of loss function parameters are evaluated using seven scenarios in a simulation study. Our method is illustrated in the context of a single-arm phase II trial of bevacizumab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3347 / 3362
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE SEARCH FOR OPTIMALITY IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1985, 53 (01) :15-24
[2]  
Berger J. O., 1985, Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, V2nd
[3]   ONE-SIDED SEQUENTIAL STOPPING BOUNDARIES FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS - A DECISION-THEORETIC APPROACH [J].
BERRY, DA ;
HO, CH .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (01) :219-227
[4]  
BERRY DA, 1989, BIOMETRICS, V41, P429
[5]   Incorporating toxicity considerations into the design of two-stage Phase II clinical trials [J].
Bryant, J ;
Day, R .
BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (04) :1372-1383
[6]  
CHEN Y, 2008, THESIS U IOWA
[7]   Bayesian adaptive designs for clinical trials [J].
Cheng, Y ;
Shen, Y .
BIOMETRIKA, 2005, 92 (03) :633-646
[8]   Designs for phase II trials allowing for a trade-off between response and toxicity [J].
Conaway, MR ;
Petroni, GR .
BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (04) :1375-1386
[9]   GUIDELINES FOR MONITORING EFFICACY AND TOXICITY RESPONSES IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
COOK, RJ ;
FAREWELL, VT .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1146-1152
[10]  
DeGroot Morris., 1970, OPTIMAL STAT DECISIO