Predictors of Frailty and Vitality in Older Adults Aged 75 years and Over: Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

被引:26
作者
de Breij, Sascha [1 ]
van Hout, Hein P. J. [2 ]
de Bruin, Simone R. [3 ]
Schuster, Noah A. [1 ]
Deeg, Dorly J. H. [1 ]
Huisman, Martijn [1 ,4 ]
Hoogendijk, Emiel O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] RIVM Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Nutr Prevent & Hlth Serv, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Sociol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Frailty; Vitality; Prediction models; Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PEOPLE; HEALTH; INDEX; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; FITNESS; RISK;
D O I
10.1159/000512049
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Frailty can be seen as a continuum, from fit to frail. While many recent studies have focused on frailty, much less attention has been paid to the other end of the continuum: the group of older adults that remain (relatively) vital. Moreover, there is a lack of studies on frailty and vitality that investigate predictors from multiple domains of functioning simultaneously. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of frailty as well as vitality among older adults aged 75 years and over. Methods: We used longitudinal data from 569 adults aged >= 75 years who participated in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Predictors from the sociodemographic, social, psychological, lifestyle, and physical domains of functioning were measured at T1 (2008-2009). We used the frailty index (FI) to identify frail (FI >= 0.25) and vital (FI <= 0.15) respondents at follow-up, 3 years later (T2: 2011-2012). We conducted logistic regression analyses with backward stepwise selection to develop and internally validate our prediction models. Results: The prevalence of frailty in our sample at follow-up was 49.4% and the prevalence of vitality was 18.3%. Predictors of frailty and vitality partly overlapped and included age, depressive symptoms, number of chronic diseases, and self-rated health. We also found predictors that did not overlap. Male sex, moderate alcohol use, more emotional support received, and no hearing problems, were predictors of vitality. Lower cognitive functioning, polypharmacy, and pain were predictors of frailty. The final model for vitality explained 42% of the variance and the final model for frailty explained 48%. Both models had a good discriminative value (area under ROC-curve [AUC] vitality: 0.88; AUC frailty: 0.85). Conclusion: Among older adults aged 75 years and over, predictors of frailty only partially overlap with predictors of vitality. The readily accessible predictors in our models may help to identify older adults who are likely to be vital, or who are at risk of frailty.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Frailty and Intrinsic Capacity: Two Distinct but Related Constructs [J].
Belloni, Giulia ;
Cesari, Matteo .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 6
[2]  
BORTZ WM, 1993, J AM GERIATR SOC, V41, P1004
[3]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the general self-efficacy scale [J].
Bosscher, RJ ;
Smit, JH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1998, 36 (03) :339-343
[4]   Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data [J].
Clegg, Andrew ;
Bates, Chris ;
Young, John ;
Ryan, Ronan ;
Nichols, Linda ;
Teale, Elizabeth Ann ;
Mohammed, Mohammed A. ;
Parry, John ;
Marshall, Tom .
AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45 (03) :353-360
[5]   Frailty in elderly people [J].
Clegg, Andrew ;
Young, John ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Rikkert, Marcel Olde ;
Rockwood, Kenneth .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9868) :752-762
[6]   Prevalence of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Systematic Review [J].
Collard, Rose M. ;
Boter, Han ;
Schoevers, Robert A. ;
Voshaar, Richard C. Oude .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (08) :1487-1492
[7]  
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1111/eci.12376]
[8]   Does frailty predict increased risk of falls and fractures? A prospective population-based study [J].
de Vries, O. J. ;
Peeters, G. M. E. E. ;
Lips, P. ;
Deeg, D. J. H. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 24 (09) :2397-2403
[9]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RASCH-TYPE LONELINESS SCALE [J].
DEJONGGIERVELD, J ;
KAMPHUIS, F .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 9 (03) :289-299
[10]   Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review [J].
Dent, Elsa ;
Kowal, Paul ;
Hoogendijk, Emiel O. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 :3-10