Iliac fixation inhibits migration of both suprarenal and infrarenal aortic endografts

被引:52
作者
Benharash, Peyman [1 ]
Lee, Jason T. [1 ]
Abilez, Oscar J. [1 ]
Crabtree, Tami [1 ]
Bloch, Daniel A. [1 ]
Zarins, Christopher K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.061
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the role of iliac fixation in preventing migration of suprarenal and infrarenal aortic endografts. Methods: Quantitative image analysis was performed in 92 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms (76 men and 16 women) treated with suprarenal (n = 36) or infrarenal (n = 56) aortic endografts from 2000 to 2004. The longitudinal centerline distance from the superior mesenteric artery to the top of the stent graft was measured on preoperative, postimplantation, and 1-year three-dimensional computed tomographic scans, with movement more than 5 mm considered to be significant. Aortic diameters were measured perpendicular to the centerline axis. Proximal and distal fixation lengths were defined as the lengths of stent-graft apposition to the aortic neck and the common iliac arteries, respectively. Results: There were no significant differences in age, comorbidities, or preoperative aneurysm size (suprarenal, 6.0 cm; infrarenal, 5.7 cm) between the suprarenal and infrarenal groups. However, the suprarenal group had less favorable aortic necks with a shorter length (13 vs 25 mm; P < .0001), a larger diameter (27 vs 24 mm; P < .0001), and greater angulation (19 degrees vs 11 degrees; P =.007) compared with the infrarenal group. The proximal aortic fixation length was greater in the suprarenal than in the infrarenal group (22 vs 16 mm; P < .0001), with the top of the device closer to the superior mesenteric artery (8 vs 21 mm; P < .0001) as a result of the 15-mm uncovered suprarenal stent. There was no difference in iliac fixation length between the suprarenal and infrarenal groups (26 vs 25 mm; P =.8). Longitudinal centerline stent graft movement at 1 year was similar in the suprarenal and infrarenal groups (4.3 +/- 4.4 mm vs 4.8 +/- 4.3 mm; P = .6). Patients with longitudinal centerline movement of more than 5 mm at 1 year or clinical evidence of migration at any time during the follow-up period comprised the respective migrator groups. Suprarenal migrators had a shorter iliac fixation length (17 vs 29 mm; P = .006) and a similar aortic fixation length (23 vs 22 mm; P > .999) compared with suprarenal nonmigrators. Infrarenal migrators had a shorter iliac fixation length (18 vs 30 mm; P < .0001) and a similar aortic fixation length (14 vs 17 mm; P = .1) compared with infrarenal nonmigrators. Nonmigrators had closer device proximity to the hypogastric arteries in both the suprarenal (7 vs 17 mm; P = .009) and infrarenal (8 vs 24 mm; P < .0001) groups. No migration occurred in either group in patients with good iliac fixation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that iliac fixation, as evidenced by iliac fixation length (P = .004) and the device to hypogastric artery distance (P = .002), was a significant independent predictor of migration, whereas suprarenal or infrarenal treatment was not a significant predictor of migration. During a clinical follow-up period of 45 22 months (range, 12-70 months), there have been no aneurysm ruptures, abdominal aortic aneurysm-related deaths, or surgical conversions in either group. Conclusions: Distal iliac fixation is important in preventing migration of both suprarenal and infrarenal aortic endografts that have longitudinal columnar support. Secure iliac fixation minimizes the risk of migration despite suboptimal proximal aortic neck anatomy. Extension of both iliac limbs to cover the entire common iliac artery to the iliac bifurcation seems to prevent endograft migration.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 257
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] The importance of iliac fixation in prevention of stent graft migration
    Heikkinen, Maarit A.
    Alsac, Jean Marc
    Arko, Frank R.
    Metsanoja, Riina
    Zvaigzne, Agnis
    Zarins, Christopher K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 43 (06) : 1130 - 1137
  • [12] Lee JT, 2002, J ENDOVASC THER, V9, P652, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2002)009<0652:SGMFER>2.0.CO
  • [13] 2
  • [14] A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Matsumura, JS
    Brewster, DC
    Makaroun, MS
    Naftel, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (02) : 262 - 271
  • [15] Conformational changes associated with proximal seal zone failure in abdominal aortic endografts
    Parra, JR
    Ayerdi, J
    McLafferty, R
    Gruneiro, L
    Ramsey, D
    Solis, M
    Hodgson, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (01) : 106 - 111
  • [16] Quality of life after endovascular and open AAA repair. Results of a randomised trial
    Prinssen, M
    Buskens, E
    Blankensteijn, JD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [17] Distal migration of stent-grafts after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Resch, T
    Ivancev, K
    Brunkwall, J
    Nyman, U
    Malina, M
    Lindblad, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (03) : 257 - 264
  • [18] Aneurysm sac thrombus load predicts type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Sampaio, SM
    Panneton, JM
    Mozes, GI
    Andrews, JC
    Bower, TC
    Kalra, M
    Cherry, KJ
    Sullivan, T
    Gloviczki, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 19 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [19] Aortic neck angulation predicts adverse outcome with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Sternbergh, WC
    Carter, G
    York, JW
    Yoselevitz, M
    Money, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (03) : 482 - 486
  • [20] Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: Results from the Zenith multicenter trial
    Sternbergh, WC
    Money, SR
    Greenberg, RK
    Chuter, TAM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (01) : 20 - 26