Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications

被引:362
作者
Loubele, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bogaerts, R. [4 ]
Van Dijck, E. [1 ]
Pauwels, R. [1 ]
Vanheusden, S. [1 ]
Suetens, P. [3 ]
Marchal, G. [5 ]
Sanderink, G. [6 ]
Jacobs, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Oral Imaging Ctr, Sch Dent Oral Pathol & Maxillofacial Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Periodontol, Sch Dent Oral Pathol & Maxillofacial Surg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Electrotech Engn, Grp Sci Engn & Technol, ESAT PSI,Ctr Proc Speech & Images, B-2440 Bus, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Expt Radiotherapy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[6] ACTA, Oral Radiol Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cone beam CT; Dentomaxillofacial; Effective radiation dose; Multi-slice CT; Jaw; CONE-BEAM CT; RANDO PHANTOM MEASUREMENTS; CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SPIRAL TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; DOSIMETRY; NEWTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the effective dose levels of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for maxillofacial applications with those of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT). Study design: The effective doses of 3 CBCT scanners were estimated (Accuitomo 3D (R), i-CAT (R), and NewTom 3G (R)) and compared to the dose levels for corresponding image acquisition protocols for 3 MSCT scanners (Somatom VolumeZoom 4 (R), Somatom Sensation 16 (R) and M x 8000 IDT (R)). The effective dose was calculated using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), placed in a Rando (R) Alderson phantom, and expressed according to the ICRP 103 (2007) guidelines (including a separate tissue weighting factor for the salivary glands, as opposed to former ICRP guidelines). Results: Effective dose values ranged from 13 to 82 mu Sv for CBCT and from 474 to 1160 mu Sv for MSCT. CBCT dose levels were the lowest for the Accuitomo 3D (R), and highest for the i-CAT (R). Conclusions: Dose levels for CBCT imaging remained far below those of clinical MSCT protocols, even when a mandibular protocol was applied for the latter, resulting in a smaller field of view compared to various CBCT protocols. Considering this wide dose span, it is of outmost importance to justify the selection of each of the aforementioned techniques, and to optimise the radiation dose while achieving a sufficient image quality. When comparing these results to previous dosimetric studies, a conversion needs to be made using the latest ICRP recommendations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 468
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ANN ICRP
[2]   RADIATION-DOSE IN RADIOGRAPHY, CT, AND ARTHROGRAPHY OF THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT [J].
CHRISTIANSEN, EL ;
MOORE, RJ ;
THOMPSON, JR ;
HASSO, AN ;
HINSHAW, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :107-109
[3]   Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[4]   Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: The Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit [J].
Dula, K ;
Mini, R ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Sanderink, GCH ;
Schneeberger, P ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (06) :735-742
[5]   ALARA still applies [J].
Farman, AG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 100 (04) :395-397
[6]   Dental CT: imaging technique, anatomy, and pathologic conditions of the jaws [J].
Gahleitner, A ;
Watzek, G ;
Imhof, H .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) :366-376
[7]   Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure [J].
Gijbels, F ;
Jacobs, R ;
Bogaerts, R ;
Debaveye, D ;
Verlinden, S ;
Sanderink, G .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (03) :145-149
[8]  
GOLIKOV VY, 1989, HEALTH PHYS, V56, P111
[9]   State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement [J].
Guerrero, ME ;
Jacobs, R ;
Loubele, M ;
Schutyser, F ;
Suetens, P ;
van Steenberghe, D .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (01) :1-7
[10]  
HUDA W, 1984, HEALTH PHYS, V47, P463