Examination of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales in Civil Forensic Settings: Findings from Simulation and Known Group Samples

被引:67
作者
Wygant, Dustin B. [1 ]
Ben-Porath, Yossef S. [2 ]
Arbisi, Paul A. [3 ]
Berry, David T. R. [4 ]
Freeman, David B. [5 ]
Heilbronner, Robert L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol, Richmond, KY 40475 USA
[2] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis VA Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Psychol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Cal Psych FMT, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Chicago Neuropsychol Grp, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
MMPI-2-RF; MMPI-2 Restructured Form; Malingering; Forensic evaluation; Medico-legal; FAKE-BAD SCALE; MALINGERED NEUROCOGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; PERSONAL-INJURY LITIGANTS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; HEAD-INJURY; DEPRESSION; TOMM; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1093/arclin/acp073
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The current study examined the effectiveness of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath and Tellegen, 2008) over-reporting indicators in civil forensic settings. The MMPI-2-RF includes three revised MMPI-2 over-reporting validity scales and a new scale to detect over-reported somatic complaints. Participants dissimulated medical and neuropsychological complaints in two simulation samples, and a known-groups sample used symptom validity tests as a response bias criterion. Results indicated large effect sizes for the MMPI-2-RF validity scales, including a Cohen's d of .90 for Fs in a head injury simulation sample, 2.31 for FBS-r, 2.01 for F-r, and 1.97 for Fs in a medical simulation sample, and 1.45 for FBS-r and 1.30 for F-r in identifying poor effort on SVTs. Classification results indicated good sensitivity and specificity for the scales across the samples. This study indicates that the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting validity scales are effective at detecting symptom over-reporting in civil forensic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allen L., 1997, Computerized Assessment of Response Bias
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[3]  
Arbisi P.A., 2006, Psychological Services, V3, P249, DOI DOI 10.1037/1541-1559.3.4.249
[4]   An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The infrequency-psychopathology scale, F(p) [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :424-431
[5]  
Archer RP, 2006, FORENSIC USES OF CLINICAL ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS, P1
[6]   The effect of depression and anxiety on the TOMM in community-dwelling older adults [J].
Ashendorf, L ;
Constantinou, M ;
McCaffrey, RJ .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 19 (01) :125-130
[7]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2011, MMPI 2 RF MINNESOTA
[8]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2008, MMPI 2 RF MANUAL ADM
[9]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2008, MMPI 2 SYMPTOM VALID
[10]  
Bianchini Kevin J, 2005, Spine J, V5, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.016