Labor market reforms and allocative efficiency in Italy

被引:9
作者
Gnocato, Nicola [1 ]
Modena, Francesca [2 ]
Tomasi, Chiara [3 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[2] Bank Italy, Trento Branch, Econ Res Unit, Trento, Italy
[3] Univ Trento, Dept Econ & Management, Via Inama 5, I-38122 Trento, Italy
关键词
Allocative efficiency; Resource allocation; Labor market reforms; Italy; CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; MISALLOCATION; DYNAMICS; IMPACT; POLICY; WAGES; TFP;
D O I
10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101938
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the extent to which labor market reforms of temporary contracts introduced in Italy at the beginning of the century influenced aggregate productivity via their effects on allocative efficiency. Using firm level data from the Italian manufacturing sector, we compute the extent of resource allocation by the covariance between firm size and productivity, and we identify the impact of the reforms by exploiting the variation in their implementation across sectors and regions. Our results suggest that the reform of apprenticeship contracts has increased the size-productivity covariance, and this aggregate effect can be rationalized through a theoretical model where the apprenticeship contract reform allows highly productive firms to gain market shares by improving their training efficiency, and by inducing them to turn a higher fraction of apprentices into permanent workforce. By contrast, the deregulation of the use of fixed-term contracts shows heterogeneous effects, with negative results among regions with long labor court disputes, and positive ones among those with less lengthy settlement procedures. The legal uncertainty associated with the reform might have reduced the incentive to use fixed-term contracts for productive firms located in regions where judicial disputes take longer to be settled.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Gender Equality and the EU's Economic Governance: The Strategic Use of Women's Employment Within Labor Market Reforms in Italy [J].
Chieregato, Elisa .
SOCIAL POLITICS, 2021, 28 (03) :806-830
[42]   Dual allocative efficiency parameters [J].
Faere, Rolf ;
Primont, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2012, 37 (03) :233-238
[43]   Allocative efficiency in branch banking [J].
Hartman, TE ;
Storbeck, JE ;
Byrnes, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 134 (02) :232-242
[44]   Dual allocative efficiency parameters [J].
Rolf Färe ;
Daniel Primont .
Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, 37 :233-238
[45]   The impact of labor market reforms on firm training for nonregular and regular workers [J].
Ko, Hyejin ;
Weaver, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2025, 34 (01)
[46]   The Labor Market Condition of Immigrants in Italy: The case of Lombardy [J].
Riva, Egidio ;
Zanfrini, Laura .
REVUE INTERVENTIONS ECONOMIQUES-PAPERS IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 47
[47]   Credit Shocks and Allocative Efficiency during a Financial Crisis [J].
Linarello, Andrea ;
Petrella, Andrea ;
Sette, Enrico .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CENTRAL BANKING, 2022, 18 (03) :125-171
[48]   Financial Liberalization, Debt Mismatch, Allocative Efficiency, and Growth [J].
Ranciere, Romain ;
Tornell, Aaron .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2016, 8 (02) :1-44
[49]   Noncompete agreements in a rigid labor market: the case of Italy [J].
Boeri, Tito ;
Garnero, Andrea ;
Luisetto, Lorenzo G. .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2024,
[50]   ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY OF AGRIFOOD TRADERS: SHRIMP TRADERS IN INDONESIA [J].
Yi, Dale ;
Reardon, Thomas .
BULLETIN OF INDONESIAN ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2015, 51 (03) :405-423